Closed (works as designed)
Project:
Drupal Licensing Working Group
Component:
Violation
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
2 Apr 2008 at 17:33 UTC
Updated:
13 Mar 2015 at 11:36 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
sunSee also: #235842: d.o license conflicts
Comment #2
mikey_p commentedThis is a rather blatant violation as well, as the user has linked to a third party license.
Here's a copy of it
I believe the following points conflict with the GPL:
Some of the other points are probably not conflicting, or may be partial conflicts, but the above appear to be enough to say that project should be blocked/unpublished, removed in some way.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html for examples of incompatibility due to advertising clauses.
Comment #3
gerhard killesreiter commentedI've contacted the maintainer.
Comment #4
silverwing commentedThe project page has this note : This module is going to be deprecated in favor of curlypage in respect of name copyright.
Is any other action going to be taken, or is this a 'wont fix' ???
Comment #5
dave reidIt does appear there is non-GPL code included in the new curlypage module:
http://drupalcode.org/viewvc/drupal/contributions/modules/curlypage/curl...
Comment #6
avpadernoWhat should we do with the deprecated module?
Shall we remove the code from CVS, or shall we just mark the releases as unsupported (if they are not already marked so)?
If I understand well, the releases should be marked as unsupported; I am not sure if the first option I listed is considered, in such cases.
Comment #7
dave reidWe should probably contact manfer to get code from the old pageear removed from CVS and mark the module as abandoned.
Comment #8
manfer commentedHi,
I don't know if there is something more to do with pageear. I just unpublised the realeases for the project page so I think drupal sites using it are going to see it as not maintained. In the project page I just wrote instructions on how to install curlypage instead. Maybe is not problem if you decide to delete the project from CVS to eliminate the included not GPL code there.
About curlypage it includes swfobject2 that is released under MIT license, compatible with GPL. If that is an issue I could solve it just using the google hosted version following this instructions:
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/hosted_library
So if it is an issue tell me and I have no problem to change the code and remove swfobject from curlypage CVS.
Thanks in advance,
manfer
Comment #9
avpadernoAs Why drupal.org doesn't host GPL-"compatible" code reports, the files in Drupal.org CVS should be licensed under GPL License v2+, which is the same license used by Drupal core module.
Comment #10
manfer commentedAbout Curlypage issue, now swfobject is loaded from external source (google hosted swfobject).
I think it is solved but I let drupal webmaster decide if it must be marked as fixed.
Comment #11
avpadernoAs Dave said, PageEar code should be removed from CVS.
Comment #12
avpadernoShould not we remove also the archives created for each release too?
Comment #13
avpadernoDoes anything else need to be done?
Comment #14
tvn commentedComment #15
damienmckennaPer comments above, the Pageear project's codebase needs to be removed from the git server.
Comment #16
holly.ross.drupal commentedComment #17
holly.ross.drupal commentedComment #18
lizzjoyComment #19
kreynen commentedComment #20
gislePageEar is depreciated in favour of CurlyPage. PageEar is marked as obsolete, there are no published releases and no users. Except for swfobject.js (permissive MIT license) I found no third party materials in PageEar. There is no need to purge swfobject.js as it can be considered relicensed as GPLv2+.
I found no third party materials in CurlyPage.
Hence, I am closing this as "works as designed".