Would it be too much of a hassle to provide compatibility with SMF 2.0?

Comments

Minstrel’s picture

Minstrel commented

I'd be interested to hear if this is feasible also.

Any chance you checked if it would work "out of the box" with 2.0 in the current beta?

vb’s picture

vb commented

Current version of the module does not support SMF2.0, only SMF1.1 line is supported.

shittii’s picture

shittii commented

How about the future versions of SMFforum Integration module when the SMF 2.0 goes final? Thanks for this great bridge! :)

XerraX’s picture

XerraX commented
Status: Active » Closed (duplicate)

Duplicate of #300559: SMF 2.0 Integration