Maybe we should add a description in the block of #new_arguments, that explains it can be used later on with rules with higher weight.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | wfng_description_new_arguments_2.patch | 885 bytes | amitaibu |
| #3 | wfng_description_new_arguments_1.patch | 887 bytes | amitaibu |
Comments
Comment #1
fagosounds like a great idea. the #new arguments features could need better docs.
It would be great if you could do a patch.
Comment #2
fagooops.
Comment #3
amitaibuattached patch.
Comment #4
amitaibusmall typo
Comment #5
fagothanks committed.
I've removed the note about the weights, as it might create confusion when the weight of the current rule is != 0.
Comment #6
Anonymous (not verified) commentedAutomatically closed -- issue fixed for two weeks with no activity.