conflict with argument handling code?
| Project: | AJAX Views |
| Version: | 5.x-1.4 |
| Component: | User interface |
| Category: | support request |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | febbraro |
| Status: | active |
Jump to:
I'm a bit stuck on this!
I'm trying to make a view block that displays node content from nodes related to the current node by a nodereference field. I've followed the instructions (I think!) and the best I can get is to get the entire page (header, side columns etc.) loading into the ajaxviews block -- not the requested views fields.
Can someone explain the role of the page view in ajaxviews? If I specify a page view (as well as the block view) and don't specify a page URL the ajaxview block never gets beyond 'Loading content for...' and if I do specify a page URL for the view, ajaxviews loads the entire page in, rather than specifically the view content.
Is my problem perhaps related to my argument handling code?, which is
<?php
$args = array();
if (arg(0) == 'node' && is_numeric(arg(1))) {
$node = node_load(arg(1));
foreach($node->field_side_panel_content_tabs as $field) {
// ids is the array with the referenced image id's
$ids[] = $field['nid'];
}
$ids= implode('+', $ids);
}
return array($ids);
?>Is this removing the ajaxviews argument?
Nooby thanks!
#1
Hey bsarchive, sorry for the delay.
Can you paste here the script tag in your head that is doing the $.get()? That will help me see what is going on, at least initially.
As far as how this all works, you need to specify a page URL, that is the only way the block knows how to dynamically grab the contents via AJAX. I have seen some cases where if there are no results returned the entire page gets displayed. With the url in the $.get you can put that directly into the browser to play with what happens when various arguments are used.
Also, I just released an update that more properly handles view arguments. Also for your arguments that are optional be sure to specify a wildcard like * or something.
#2
#3
Thanks for getting back to me.
The script is
$(document).ready(function() {
$.get('/sca/ajax', {page: 0}, function(data, status) {
$('.ajax-view-block-sidebar-content2').html(data);
});
})
but then only when I have no other arguments in the view. If I add an argument, even with no argument handling code, the block doesn't render and the jscript is absent from the head.
I've tried doing a print_r($args); but with no luck. What is the ajaxviews argument and where's it meant to go?
Also, I can't get the ajaxview block to render any node fields other than the title, despite having more fields listed in the view. ?
Many thanks for your help!
#4
What version of ajax_views do you are using?
#5
version 5.x-1.4
#6
The AJAX views argument is /ajax and it is added in the arguments wherever it is specified in the ordering. Have you specified "Return all values" and a wildcard for your arguments even if they are not present? or did you specify "Page not found"?
#7
With respect to your question about more node fields than just the title, follow http://drupal.org/node/211647 as that is a known limitation and will most likely be ironed out there.
#8
Didn't want to create a new ticket because the problem is very similar.
Let me describe the problem: I have a view page that displays nodes connected with current via nodereference field. I'd like to have a block with ajax pager that will display that nodes. Everything seems to be simple: I followed all instructions, created ajax_views block but... It seems that function _generate_ajax_url(...) doesn't handle php arguments.
According to this argument code:
<?phpif (arg(0) == "node" && is_numeric(arg(1))) {
$node = node_load(arg(1));
if ($node->type == "some_node_type") {
return array(arg(1));
}
}
?>
real url of view is: my_nodes_page/[nid], so, ajax_views url should be: my_nodes_page/ajax/[nid]. When I go to "my_nodes_page/ajax/[nid]" it shows me nodes related to [nid], so everything is just fine here. The problem is that _generate_ajax_url(...) doesn't generate proper URL.
Do you have any suggestions on how this can be fixed? The module is just great, I would not want to replace it with something else in my project.
Thanks!
#9
ping?