Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Taxonomy Breadcrumb
Version:
5.x-1.4
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
31 May 2008 at 19:41 UTC
Updated:
2 Oct 2012 at 09:58 UTC
It would be nice to have an option that would allow for nodes that are in the drupal menu system heirarchy (which sets its own breadcrumbs based on menu path) to not have their breadcrumbs overwritten by taxonomy breadcrumb. Basically, let the menu system breadcrumb have priority. Any ideas on how to do this another way would be great. Maybe a feature for taxonomy_breadcrumb? This option would allow setting up custom paths for taxonomy terms in the breadcrumb on pages that are not in the menu tree -- and leave the menu assigned nodes alone. Good for SEO. Thanks for your consideration.
Comments
Comment #1
MGN commentedI like the idea, and would welcome a patch that would do this. At the moment I don't have time to investigate how to make this work, but I will leave it as an open feature request in the hope that someone else would like to contribute.
Thanks for the idea!
Comment #2
saml commentedI guess what would be the best is a general module, something like "pathauto", but for breadcrumbs, so that you can choose, for each content type, and each taxonomy, how breadcrumbs should be constructed.
Unfortunately I don't have the drupal experience needed to contribute too much to this except for testing.
Comment #3
saml commentedWell, I read now on the project page for "Custom Breadcrumb" ( http://drupal.org/project/custom_breadcrumbs ) that integration between that module, and this one, is in the workings, so thumbs up for that!
Comment #4
MGN commented@Samuel Lampa, yes in fact the integration is underway. See #287471: Support taxonomy breadcrumbs in custom breadcrumbs 2 for a discussion of features/use cases for custom_breadcrumbs_taxonomy for D6.
@lutegrass, Unfortunately, I am still not sure how to avoid overriding the menu system heirarchy, so I will leave this as an active feature request.
Comment #5
jantoine commentedClosing as the 5.x branch is no longer supported.