Closed (fixed)
Project:
OG Vocabulary
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
3 Jul 2008 at 16:55 UTC
Updated:
12 Jan 2009 at 22:10 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
moshe weitzman commentedYes, I am very interested in this feature. It probably does belong in OG Vocab itself. I started to implement this once but got sidetracked. I was toying with a model where an admin sets up a model vocab with terms and then that one gets copied to new groups.
Comment #2
darren.ferguson commentedMiglius, Moshe, per the information above please review this patch against the d6 head for the og_vocab module to implement this functionality.
Respectfully,
Darren Ferguson
Comment #3
darren.ferguson commentedSorry, forgot to add the og_vocab.admin.inc file, here it is attached to this posting.
Comment #4
geodaniel commentedComment #5
moshe weitzman commented1. This patch does not allow for terms to have any hierarchy. I'd like to support that. Thats why I was working towards having admin setup a model vocab that gets cloned as needed. If that is too complex, perhaps we ask admin to fill in a textarea and use dashes to signify depth/hierarchy. Like so:
Food
-- Dairy
---- Milk
---- Cheese
-- Meat
---- Chicken
---- Pork
2. if we use system_settings_form() like other settings pages, we don't need out own og_vocab_admin_settings_submit() function. am i missing something?
Comment #6
dan_aka_jack commentedHello,
I too am very eager to see this functionality implemented. I have applied Darren Ferguson's patch and it works perfectly for me - it offers just the right amount of control without being too complex to administer. Having said that, Moshe's idea to allow terms to have a hierarchy would be very welcome.
Thanks for all the work everyone,
Jack
Comment #7
amitaibuMaybe Rules module should do it. There is a discussion about integration with core taxonomy but og_vocab was mentioned as-well.
Comment #8
darren.ferguson commentedWill try and implement via Moshe's suggestion, will discuss with some people in our group who have more experience in this piece, so the implementation is correct and not done shabbily.
Comment #9
amitaibuI've added Rules integration - it depends on #350831: Add taxonomy vocab actions