Flagged this as minor - as it is, well, less than minor.

Firstly, love the theme, used it here: www.sheffieldnarrowboats.com and it looks just like I wanted it to look - and all pretty much 'out of the box', so cheers and many thanks.

Do you have any plans to make revisions to clean up the odd little bits that would result in a good W3C result?

To be honest, I'm not totally sure it's your, or my code that returns: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sheffieldnarrowboats....

Just a question - nothing else - I'll still use it :-)

Thanks again

Comments

jcnventura’s picture

jcnventura
Primary language English
commented
Status: Active » Closed (fixed)

It's all your HTML's fault. I use an aberdeen site that validates correctly as XHTML 1.0 Strict.

It's actually four lines in your HTML with <hr> elements that make it invalid.

João