Should memetracker depend on machine_learning_api?
marcp - August 17, 2008 - 16:58
| Project: | Memetracker |
| Version: | 6.x-1.1-alphpa5 |
| Component: | Code |
| Category: | support request |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | active |
Description
Kyle - I'm still just looking at code, so that's where I'm coming from with this.
I would have expected memetracker to depend on machine_learning_api instead of the way it is now. I guess I just think of an API as more of a base level piece of code. I'm sure there will be follow-on modules that will depend on memetracker, so memetracker may end up being a base level module, but it still seems like the machine_learning_api module would be even "baser" if that's a word.
Could you please clear this up for me? It's probably just my lack of understanding of the project.
Thanks,
Marc
