View attached screenshots to see the difference.
Although views is a contrib module I think Zen should be 'nice' and define for it as well.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 342004_1_table_width.patch | 396 bytes | amitaibu |
| zen.png | 16.87 KB | amitaibu | |
| garland.png | 17.05 KB | amitaibu |
Comments
Comment #1
amitaibusorry, views has nothing to do with it. Patch attached.
Comment #2
kmontyThis is something I set on basically all of my websites. The only drawback could be potentially confusing someone who just wants a narrow table centered on a page in the middle of an article, or aligned to the right/left/etc of a page.
However, Zen's point is to be light started theme and not really presume how you want to style your content. This might not be appropriate.
Comment #3
amitaibuEven if this is the case it's worth having a placeholder, i.e.
Comment #4
yoroy commentedI like this because autosized tables look rather cramped by default. Going for 100% width by default would actually make most tables a bit more readable I think. The point #2 makes against this is a good one but I wouldn't mind Zen providing a "better" default here.
+1, can't really rtbc this because I didn't apply the actual patch.
Comment #5
SeanBannister commented+1 I always make this change as well, while Zen is designed to be light weight there would be few people who wouldn't make this change.
Comment #6
johnalbinI went with the placeholder
/* width: 100%; */ /* Prevent cramped-looking tables */Thanks, Amitai!