Come together with the global Drupal community in Rotterdam, 28 Sept – 1 Oct 2026. Sessions, contribution, connection, and Early Bird savings until 8 June.Because I have more than one account, I received the "False account" warning.
For me it is misleading to call the accounts "false" instead of "repeated".
As a matter of fact I use the later in the Spanish translation.
Do not you think that it is more correct to call it "repeated account detector" or similar and let the Admin figure out if he considered the account to be OK, false, fake or whatever?
Comments
Comment #1
nunoveloso commentedJorge,
I understand your point. In the same way you can ask why permissions on the core are called "user access". But after all, as admin you know how to use and what to do with that feature. So I think this semantic aspect shouldn't be a problem for the admin.
Indeed, this module is designed for administrators or moderators that should know if the account is a false account or just a repeated account. I explain: if you are user #1 and also have an test user account, you know that it is a repeated account, so you can whitelist that. On the other and, if user x and user y have the same false account, and user x promotes karma user y, then you should know that it is a false account.
Hope my explanation helped.
Comment #2
Jorge Campo commentedYes, you are right. Since the page is only for admins, we know ("supossed to know" in my case) what it is all about.
Comment #3
Jorge Campo commented