This is probably because I don't have any user relationships yet (still testing all this), but I thought I may as well report it - came across the error while I was working on something else. No performance impact yet noted.

pairs[i].split is not a function
parseQueryString()("page=1")base.js?q (line 69)
(?)()()ajax_view.js?q (line 104)
(?)()(Object length=9 0=a.active 1=a.active 2=a.active 3=a.active, function(), undefined)jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
(?)()(function(), undefined)jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
(?)()()ajax_view.js?q (line 103)
(?)()(Object length=1 0=div.view prevObject=Object jquery=1.2.6, function(), undefined)jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
(?)()(function(), undefined)jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
(?)()(0, Object view_name=apk_user_tracker)ajax_view.js?q (line 97)
(?)()([Object view_name=apk_user_tracker 0=Object], function(), undefined)jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
ViewsAjaxView()()ajax_view.js?q (line 49)
(?)()()drupal.js?q (line 42)
(?)()(Object, function(), undefined)jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
attachBehaviors()(Document 1)drupal.js?q (line 41)
(?)()()drupal.js?q (line 276)
(?)()()jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
(?)()()jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
(?)()([function(), function(), function()], function(), undefined)jquery.j...e3Q%3D%3D (line 1)
(?)()()

APK rocks!

Comments

michelle’s picture

Project: Advanced Profile Kit » Views (for Drupal 7)
Version: 6.x-1.x-dev » 6.x-2.2

Sending this over to the views queue after discussing with merlinofchaos.

Michelle

merlinofchaos’s picture

Status: Active » Postponed (maintainer needs more info)

Has this ever recurred? I've not seen anything like this recently, but it's hard to say for sure.

David Stosik’s picture

Status: Postponed (maintainer needs more info) » Active

Hello,
I am experiencing the same issue.
You can have a look at it on this page: http://www.rfi.fr/emission/musiques-monde .
It seems to come from the use of "for (i in pairs)" : in one pass of the loop, "i" equals to "indexOf".
This is because of IE6's "foreach" which takes everything it can find in the object "pairs".
My suggestion would be to use "for(i=0; i < pairs.length; i++)".

Regards,
David

dawehner’s picture