Why Is WYSIWYG Such a Pain in the??? Drupal is How Old?

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 06:09

Why is WYSIWYG editors such a pain in the as&??? It seems that this is a rediculous apllication... Who wants images? Everyone. I am having problem sgetting these modules to work with drupal...

What am I doing wrong...

FCKeditor wont upload images, I get a server error...
TINYmce wont upload photos.

What in teh hell have I gotten myself into? I have wasted more time messing with wysiwyg editors than setting up my site and getting everything else working. I have about had enough and deciding that its easier to just go and make each html page by hand. Hundreds of them.

Can someone explain what Im missing? I googled stuff and it all says to do these things, but it never works... I just wan tinline images in my articles... Is that too much Drupal? I know you are free, but you dont have to be monochramtic out the box...

Easier way

codelust - February 10, 2009 - 06:15

You can use TinyTinyMce with IMCE. It pretty much works out of the box as advertised. Much easier than the regular TinyMce or FCKeditor installs, or even the WYSIWYG route.

But you need to consider the fact that WYSIWYG is the route that core is taking forward, so support maybe be an issue for anything else in days to come (speculation).

Thanks,
Shyam

there are lots of ways of

jwells - February 10, 2009 - 06:26

there are lots of ways of adding images to Drupal. Goto the Media Section in Download Modules.

You should take the night and review which works best for you. (on a test site)

I like CCK Imagefield and ImageCache together

here is a video about that methodology

http://www.drupaltherapy.com/node/47

good luck - you need to expect a learning curve

I had installed 14 modules,

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 07:13

I had installed 14 modules, trying to get the ability to upload form my diroectory/ This last time with 14 modules I used tinymce... For some reason I cant get it to work. I am thinking about dropping drupal altogether. I have a lot of sites, and I was thinking about using Drupal but this it crazy BS to just get one thing working I installed 14 modules, and I got most of it to work, but still no uploading from my directory.

How mayn modules and other fluff do I need for tinytinymce? This is about 4 hours or more Ive been messing with this...

The learning curve with mambo, joomla, and magento. Even creloaded as bad as it sucks didnt take this long to figure something out. Its just getting to me that this doesnt already have the wysiwyg edotor included in it. Its already at 7

Robert, I can somewhat

codelust - February 10, 2009 - 07:26

Robert,

I can somewhat sympathize with you on getting WYSIWYG to work. It should ideally not be this hard, but unfortunately that is the case at the moment. That said, having been in the business of managing and serving content for about 10 years now, I have found Drupal to be the best solution out there. It has a VERY steep learning curve, but it is well worth the effort once you get the hang of it.

As I'd mentioned before, if it is critical to your business use TinyTinyMce: http://drupal.org/project/tinytinymce alongside IMCE.

After having tried the 14-module route like you, which I had trouble getting to work, this worked like a breeze, it is easy to configure too.

Do give it a shot if you could.

Thanks

http://www.drupaltherapy.com/node/47

mnederlanden - February 10, 2009 - 22:52

Great video, thanks for the help! Do you podcast them?

Matthew Nederlanden
CEO of rhiz.antho.us the crowdsourced advertising platform and digital marketer for a few sites including V-Rooms, the virtual data rooms solution, and Liquid DJs, the Miami DJ

Just to add a note: First,

cog.rusty - February 10, 2009 - 07:19

Just to add a note:

First, be convinced that they all work. You can see that WYSIWYG editors are pretty popular in http://drupal.org/project/usage, and if all these people got them to work, you can too. Any one of them.

Second, because they usually involve integration with some third party code and then some configuration, choose only one, follow their installation instructions to the letter, and don't make any assumptions.

The biggest part Im having

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 07:54

The biggest part Im having is to get image uploads from my machine to the website. I have gottne the modules to work, I just catn get any of the image uploaders to work. Maybe Im missing something. I thought I might be too stupid to figure ot out, but Ive figured out everything else, I just seem to be hitting a wall here..

Heres the modules I installed and cant get any uploaders to work. Many of them are reliant on other modules. Not all are employed. Cant get them to work. I cant understand how or why it is set up this way.

first I need to ftp to the sites/modules folder
then go to modules and turn it on
then go give permissions and set up the directory. Is there somthing im missing?

Heres what I have: They are in the modules folder. tinymce is in the wysiwig folder

Image 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images.
Image assist 6.x-2.0-alpha2 This module allows users to upload and insert inline images into posts. It automatically Image Attach 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Allows easy attaching of image nodes to other content types.
Image Browser 6.x-1.0-beta1 A simple and beautiful image browser/manager for Drupal and FCKEditor.
Image Gallery 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Allows sorting and displaying of image galleries based on categories.
Image Import 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Allows batches of images to be imported from a directory on the server.
ImageMagick Advanced Options 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Adds advanced options to the ImageMagick image toolkit.
ImageCache
ImageAPI 6.x-1.3 ImageAPI supporting multiple toolkits.
ImageAPI GD2 6.x-1.3 Uses PHP's built-in GD2 image processing support.
ImageAPI ImageMagick 6.x-1.3 Command Line ImageMagick support.
IMCE 6.x-1.1 An image/file uploader and browser supporting personal directories and user quota.
Wysiwyg 6.x-0.5 Allows users to edit contents with client-side editors.

If you want it simple and

cog.rusty - February 10, 2009 - 08:14

If you want it simple and don't need each individual image categorized, commented etc, then you could use IMCE and disable all other image-related modules.

I had IMCE but maybe

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 08:31

I had IMCE but maybe something wasnt configured correctly. I couldnt get images from my computer. I dont know. Maybe Ill give it a rest and come abck t oit later.

I had tinymce and IMCE installed. No go for whatever reason. I just want to put a pic in the article, maybe format the text around it. I dont need image galleries and this and that.

I tried FCKEditor and get a

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 08:29

I tried FCKEditor and get a server error now... I guess Ill have to spend some time trouble shooting. This sinst much fin at all... I have about 100 websites. It is easy to make pages with Drupal, but modifying the software is a dreadful thing that makes me think that the updates will be an absolute nightmare...

Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, support@supportwebsite.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

this might be a silly

jwells - February 10, 2009 - 10:07

this might be a silly question ... but how big are these images - sometimes there are host restrictions

Is it possible that the

cog.rusty - February 10, 2009 - 11:08

Is it possible that the "internal server error" is not caused by image uploads but by something else?

On some hosts, this server error can be fixed by editing Drupal's .htaccess file,
- disabling all Options ... lines
- and/or settings RewriteBase /
- and/or disabling the <FilesMatch> sections
- and/or disabling mod_security (http://drupal.org/node/110219)

Also watch out for trailing slashes in any files directory paths that you have specified.

Ill check these. The error

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 15:33

Ill check these.

The error occurs as soon as I click on the add image icon. Before I even select a photo.

For some reason in Modules, the FCKEditor is "missing". I cant enable the Image Browser module now... hmmmm.

Thanks for the replies guys. I think Im just going to go with joomla or mambo or something. This is too much. Im worried about downt he road if I need to upgrade and something this stupid is right here in front of me. It seems tath it is a good way to manage content, but not very well thought out in many aspects.

Okay. Id elted all the

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 17:41

Okay. Id elted all the modules in the whole thing that I installed. I installed tinytinymce and couldnt get anything. then iinstalled imce. nothing. moved them to the modules folder in sites, not working. I put the jscripts in tinymce folder like it says. nothing.

I have to be missing something. I thought I was just stupid. However Ive figured out many other software options before with multiple other websites with less trouble.

I went to permissions and tried messing witht hat a bit and cant figure it out.

Is there something altogether that I am not seeing?

I installed the wysiwyg module and enabled it
I put the tinytinymce in the /all/modules/ directory and also tried moving it to the all/modules/wysiwyg/ folder.
I went to the tinytinymce config in site configuration
I put the javascripts in the tinytinymce folder tiny_mce that includes the scripts (the tinytiny had instructions)
clicked every box in the permissions for authenticated user.
made a directory path in imce config
have full html as default in input formats
have edited the cache page

What int he world am I doing wrong then? I cant get the tinytint to work at all...

_

WorldFallz - February 10, 2009 - 18:08

Ive tried about all the wysiwyg modules at one time or another and I can verify that They Do Work. However, as they all involve integration with a 3rd party product (the editor itself), the installation is a bit more complex than the standard drupal module install. From what I read in your posts, I would bet money you're not following the installation instructions completely.

My current recommendation for when you want images to be nodes is fckeditor with the image and image_browser modules.

For cases where you just want inline images that are not nodes themselves i recommend fckeditor with the IMCE module.

Also, due to wysiwyg's spotty support of the fckeditor editor at the moment, I recommend using the fckeditor module itself for the time being (though I fully expect for wysiwyg to completely support fckeditor in the future).

In any case, you'll need to read and follow the installation instructions completely and thoroughly. And post back with any specific questions or issues that come up.

Of course you're free to use whatever CMS you like (and quite frankly, no one really cares what you use but you), but drupal is by far the most powerful and flexible. Yes, there is a learning curve, but the time spent climbing it is well worth it in end. However, if you don't really need that power and flexibility you'd probably be better off using joomla or simplecms.

One other thing-- you might want to tone down your rhetoric in future posts. Insulting the project and the very people you're asking for assistance is rather poor form.

===
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." - Lao Tzu
"God helps those who help themselves." - Ben Franklin
"Search is your best friend." - Worldfallz

For cases where you just

robert_danob - February 10, 2009 - 18:37

For cases where you just want inline images that are not nodes themselves i recommend fckeditor with the IMCE module.

Also, due to wysiwyg's spotty support of the fckeditor editor at the moment, I recommend using the fckeditor module itself for the time being (though I fully expect for wysiwyg to completely support fckeditor in the future).

Ill try this. Im going to reinstall drupal. For soem readon I keep getting fckeditor "missing" or wont show upo in the modules area.

Thanks

Upload & Display Images Inline with Content

AshokanKid - February 10, 2009 - 20:49

Hey there Robert;

Like you I have many sites to maintain and update and have also been struggling with an "elegant" solution for adding inline images to my content pages.

Pretty much one of the first "solutions" that I have gotten working is a basic install of Drupal and these modules ULed and enabled;

Upload 6.9 Allows users to upload and attach files to content.
Required by: Inline (enabled) (Core Module)

Image 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images.
Required by: Image Attach (enabled), Image Gallery (disabled), Image Import (disabled), Image assist (enabled)

Image assist 6.x-1.0 This module allows users to upload and insert inline images into posts. It automatically generates an Add image link under the textarea fields of your choice.
Depends on: Image (enabled) I think THIS Is the one that is actually WORKING for me!

Image Attach 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Allows easy attaching of image nodes to other content types.
Depends on: Image (enabled)

ImageMagick Advanced Options 6.x-1.0-alpha4 Adds advanced options to the ImageMagick image toolkit.

Inline 6.x-1.0 Allows attached files to be placed into the body of a node either automatically or by using simple tags.
Depends on: Upload (enabled) This also my be one that is working ?

Apparently, the picture that I ULed (640 X 640 or so) has been "placed" via HTML code into my page content edit window as a thumbnail (my choice), and then I can just type around (above or below) the code and it then "flows" the text around the picture., more or less. Not great, but kinda works.

I guess that if I really wanted to "place" the picture perfectly in the page I would resort to a table(s) within the page text edit area in order to precisely position and display the text and picture exactly where I want it. Perhaps not the best solution, but it works (again, more or less).

This is only the first of my tests, but it is working. Is it perfect? Heck no., and to have to resort to bulding code within a text content edit box seems awfully silly with a CMS system like Drupal, but., Oh well., gotta do what ya' gotta do, I suppose. I'll keep testing and report on this.
More suggestions here; http://drupal.org/node/371582

Soo., a little history, I just checked., apparently Mosaic was the first GUI browser that supported inline images with text back in 1993., and so well over a decade & a half later we have the much heralded Drupal CMS system within which we are STILL struggling with inline image support. Go figure., ;-)

not a good comparison

justageek - February 10, 2009 - 22:51

comparing a timeline for when browsers included image support to a feature in a content management framework isapples vs. oranges.

Yep., could be.,

AshokanKid - February 10, 2009 - 23:33

"comparing a timeline for when browsers included image support to a feature in a content management framework isapples vs. oranges"

Except that Apples (text) and Oranges (image graphics) are pretty much the ONLY things that a web browser / web page is asked or expected to display~!

Let us think about this., what else IS on a web page? You have text content., and then you have graphc image content (and then the layout / interchange of both).

Soo., Mosaic back in 1993 could display BOTH the Apples (text) AND the Oranges (graphic images)., but we are saying that Drupal, in 2009 is only "expected" to work with the Apples (text)?!?!

Sorry., but that is NOT just comparing Apples to Oranges for my sense and sensibility. Perhaps when Drupal first came out in 2001 or so.,maybe., but in 2009? Nope, not gonna fly, sorry.,

Is comparing a Facebook user to a potential user of a web site that a Drupal developer might want to build also comparing Apples to Oranges?

Why should a Facebook user (who all dumbed down and knowing NO jot of HTML "expects" inline image suppport) be any more privileged than any Drupal Site user?

I am SOOO feeling YOUR pain, Brother.,

AshokanKid - February 10, 2009 - 19:44

Funny that I was just going through all of this only this week myself. http://drupal.org/node/371582

I am going to be testing "solutions" and am already giving MUCH thanks and appreciation to the Wonderful Drupal Community for all of their support and advice. Thanks to ALL~!

AK

Just another post to say

-Anti- - February 10, 2009 - 21:31

Just another post to say you're not alone. It took me about 100 hours to research and test the most popular methods for adding media. I eventually settled on IMCE/FCKEditor/JQueryMedia/Lightbox2, which still has inadequacies and quirks. And it is still harder than it should be for the users to add media. However, I'm not sure I could get as much media functionality from any of the other cms, perhaps with the exception of wordpress.

JUst want to say that YES

Tenx - February 10, 2009 - 21:42

JUst want to say that YES you are not alone , these WYSISWG are really really hard to work with Each one of them has its own problem .FCKEditor being the worse of them all. What i would recommend is to uninstall all those 14 modules you have on your system , and start again with just TinyTiNY MCE and IMCE , if that dont work then disabled them or uninstall them and try the next one .

Good luck

Absolutely., ten times over.,

AshokanKid - February 10, 2009 - 21:45

Yes, it sure seems like Drupal was "designed" as a blogger, lister, commenter, mainly text type of CMS with other "functionality" added after the fact. BUT, now perhaps Drupal is "coming of age" as a full fledged web system app and so perhaps more and more may clamor for basic image support.

Since I have only (barely now) been "onboard" with Drupal for about a year and finally decided that THIS will be my dev platform of choice, I will be campaigning heavily for the most BASIC of image handling support. My very own first live site, created entirely in Notepad, went online Jan. 1, 2000 and was almost ENTIRELY an image based site with only brief text descriptions (Vintage Guitars).

Even WAY back then, almost ten years ago, there was NO way any semi-commercial, self respecting web site would EVER go live without a plethora of nicely placed images sprinkled throughout the site. Listservs were becoming old & stale and newsfeeds even had image support (I think). And now, ending out the decade we really have to make this a Drupal priority.

Is it possible that many of the Drupal old-timers were either only using Drupal for mainly text based sites (yeesh, hee-hee, like THIS one perhaps?) OR just bit the bullet and cobbled together their own "solutions" for image support? Nowadays, image support is not a "feature" or add-on for "some site functionality"., it is a definite requirement for any site worthy of the internet (IMHO).

I agree with you... it is

hedac - February 11, 2009 - 03:01

I agree with you... it is important for a CMS to have a wysiwyg editor.... because it is what the editor uses the most.. adding content to a site is what you do most of the time when a site is done. To facilitate the task of adding content is a must.

What I would like to see is a way of inserting the imagefield images into the textarea of the editor with a selected imagecache preset so I can position the image within the article where I want to and at the same time have the images as imagefields... not only as uploaded files with IMCE.
then you can hidden the imagefields for the teaser and full view. and they will be displayed only with the html code of the textarea... but they would be included in the node as imagefields and could be used in views.

would be cool
is it possible? Did I miss something?

_

WorldFallz - February 11, 2009 - 03:25

Sounds like a good implementation to me. And of course it's possible, just about anything is possible.

But as with all these threads, there's plenty of incredulity and "+1"s and very little code, effort, or funding.

I'm sure i'll be attacked for pointing this out, as I always am, but forum posts expressing incredulity about the lack of feature x followed by a litany of "+1" comments are a complete waste of time.

If even 1/2 the people complaining about how important this is, and i don't mean in just this thread, put forth some effort or funding toward it-- it would probably be a good way along, if not already included, in core.

It would seem it's only important if its completely free and effortless.

And please, i beg you, spare me the "i don't know how" straw men... there's always a way to drive a feature request. you don't have to be a coder.

===
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." - Lao Tzu
"God helps those who help themselves." - Ben Franklin
"Search is your best friend." - Worldfallz

+1 .. lol, but seriously

entrigan - February 11, 2009 - 04:52

+1 .. lol, but seriously well said.

One way to achieve inline image insertion (and avoid a whole lot of headaches) is to avoid wysiwyg editors all together. I recommend Markdown Filter plus Custom Filter. Basically Markdown handles all of the text formatting, and then you can make a custom filter to replace some string e.g. ![imagename] with an image. Custom Filter does require some regex knowledge to define the pattern replacements, but ultimately it is so much more enjoyable (when feasible) than fuddling around (both as the author and admin) with a wysiwyg.

http://drupal.org/project/markdown
http://drupal.org/project/customfilter

Any site examples of the various workarounds., ?

AshokanKid - February 11, 2009 - 05:55

What might be helpful is a post of various methods or workarounds or combination of module functionalities and the resultant examples or site samples of each.

Hmm., as WorldFallz and others have noted, this is a Community effort and little or nothing is going to happen without some group involvement. Nothing comes completely for free.,. ?

I just suggested a great idea above., posting examples of various options., and now instead of hoping or expecting that someone else will accept and take up this mantle.,

It may now be up to ME to be the one to actually DO this both for myself AND for others who come after me. How many have done this testing for themselves already?

Documenting and archiving is something that gets done in one way or another, though does not always get "published" for the greater good. Soo., this will be a project of mine now.

There seem to be as many examples and suggestions of how to get images into content pages as there are developers out there AND combinations of modules available.

I found after Googling several different "best practices" methods of doing this task and am testing each of the methods. I'll post my own results for posterity once completed.

Thanks for the many replies.

robert_danob - February 11, 2009 - 08:13

Thanks for the many replies. I was becoming inundated with frustration. I have dealt with many other website formats and didnt have the level of anger dwelling inside cause I couldnt get an image wehre I wanted it.

I finally just uninstalled the whoel thing and reinstalled. I added tinymce and tinytinymce... tinymce worked. I used the dozen or so image, image assist, image etc etc modules that depend on som any other image modules and it works. I can upload an image. However I cant place the fullsize image yet. The only images I can place one I upload them are the ones with a thumbnail. THe small, and med. THe large image doesnt have a thumbnail, so I cant drag it onto my content page. Bummer. Maybe Ill figure it out. This is definately a pain. Theres no way I would deal with this on a live site. I have sites that have to go live with better content, as of noe the real ones are liek this, image barren. Luckily its fitting in so far, as no one is complaining yet. Its drupal and civicm for a association/club type deal.

Im thinking about trying those other mods for the images. I understand it a little better, but it still isnt right there for some reason. Oh, and I had to go into the database and manually change the dir folder as it was not working by changing it in admin...?

www.northamericanape.com now has crappy, poorly placed photos. But they are photos nonetheless... Im afraid that anything put on there could come crashing down at any time. Ill play with it some and get a feel for it. It makes me so danged angry sometimes. It doenst behave like I would expect it to... Overall content managemnt is fast and easy. But the mods are aconfusing, and some instructions are more than confusing to say the least.

Thanks everyone for your help and ideas...

_

WorldFallz - February 11, 2009 - 16:23

Excellent! I'm sure even this documentation will be very helpful to MANY people. I would see about including it in the handbooks rather than a random forum post though. IIRC, anyone can now add pages to the handbook-- the key will be finding the proper place to put it. I haven't kept up with the documentation team as much as I'd like, but it might be worth pinging them as they are going through all the docs in preparation for the d.o redesign.

===
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." - Lao Tzu
"God helps those who help themselves." - Ben Franklin
"Search is your best friend." - Worldfallz

> Custom Filter does require

-Anti- - February 11, 2009 - 08:19

> Custom Filter does require some regex knowledge to define the pattern replacements,
> but ultimately it is so much more enjoyable (when feasible) than fuddling around
> (both as the author and admin) with a wysiwyg

That's ok if you only have a handful of people who know what they're doing maintaining the site. But you can't expect end users of a community to do anything other than press buttons and drag and drop. Copy/pasting a url into a text field is even unfeasible in some situations (eg. my school website).

I think the real problem is that the people coding Drupal, by the social circles they keep, have never met anyone who doesn't know what the 'return' key is, or what 'RightClick + Drag' means, and the devs can't conceive that typing bbcode, urls and parameters is completely out of the sphere of many people's ability (especially young children and old teachers).

Most of the website users of

robert_danob - February 11, 2009 - 15:16

Most of the website users of mine are older, not computer savvy, not tech savvy. This makes a terrible clash with drupal and entering stuff into the 'puter... Especiallly with a text editor that doesnt make it any easier. Its frustrating for me too.

_

WorldFallz - February 11, 2009 - 16:40

I would think the viral nature of wikipedia would tend to negate this argument, but I do see your point.

However, implementing a wysiwyg tool that isn't really wysiwyg introduces it's own set of usability problems. People are used to word type interfaces where wys really is wyg which, by the very nature of HTML , CSS, and browsers isn't true on the web.

I think the real problem is that the people coding Drupal, by the social circles they keep, have never met anyone who doesn't know what the 'return' key is...

I know for a fact, this is not true. Like everyone else, they just use the workarounds which work ok. Not great, but ok. Drupal is open source and very much a scratch your own itch community. This is not their particular itch, so it hasn't gotten scratched. And for whatever reason, the people who's itch it is choose to complain in the forums rather than do something about it.

I keep hearing about how great dreamweaver is at this. It amazes me that people who think nothing of spending $400 for the oh so 90's dreamweaver don't contribute a dime toward a feature they Must Have in the web2.0 world of drupal. Sun has been toiling away on getting wysiwyg api into core-- and all the while his 'chip-in' link sits empty.

Its really very hard to take this "i gotta have it' sentiment seriously while that chip-in widget is still at $0.

===
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." - Lao Tzu
"God helps those who help themselves." - Ben Franklin
"Search is your best friend." - Worldfallz

_

WorldFallz - February 11, 2009 - 16:17

+1 right back at ya entrigan ;-)~

Thanks for mentioning this-- I always forget to list this as an option. It's actually my personal preferred method of content editing, but for whatever reason it gives my corporate users a brain embolism if they don't see a wysiwyg gui when they go to edit something.

===
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." - Lao Tzu
"God helps those who help themselves." - Ben Franklin
"Search is your best friend." - Worldfallz

I hunted around and found YUI Rich Text Editor

DDay - February 11, 2009 - 18:11

After reading a ton of reviews I installed YUI Rich Text Editor at http://drupal.org/project/yui_editor. I installed it just like any other module, no special instructions and the image upload worked out of the box. I do not have any other image module installed. It requires the main YUI module to work, but thats it.

thank I didn't know about

hedac - February 12, 2009 - 00:31

thank I didn't know about that module... it seems very cool!

Ill look at that one too.

robert_danob - February 12, 2009 - 03:47

Ill look at that one too. Im not very happy with the way that the data entry is set up. It is basically data entry as it is out of the box. I got it working but its mediocre at best. Hopefully it wont make problems. Now that I have it working Ill mess with it a while and see how I can do with it.

Thanks

I understand

sgprs - February 12, 2009 - 06:56

I understand where you're coming from, Robert. First, I agree that Drupal should have a WYSIWYG editor in it's core, right out of the box. I mean, in all reality, no half decent site can live without one. It seems to be a no brainer to me. And believe me, I sure as heck had my rounds with Drupal for the first month or so... many long nites, early mornings, long hours, module after module, install and uninstall, be careful with this, don't touch that... I was going crazy!

But, I honestly have to say that I'm very glad I didn't give up... because Drupal is by far the most powerful and stable CMS available. What it has the power to do is amazing. I used Mambo last, and hey, Mambo is not bad at all. But, it feels dated. Joomla, to me, was frustrating, especially 1.5. Drupal is MUCH, MUCH easier to create content, faster and more logical.

But I will admit that Drupal is lacking a really, really good AND easy image gallery. Brilliant Gallery - I couldn't get working and gace up. Gallery 2 - Nahhh. Flash Gallery - Nope, don't like flash.

OK, so here's what I decided to do: I needed an image gallery AND video gallery. I came across Kaltura - http://drupal.org/project/kaltura and decided to give it a shot. Guess what? For me, it works great (well, almost). It's an all-in-one for image and video - just what I needed. It displays the images in a gallery with thumbs, uses lightbox2... and best of all, it's SUPER simple to upload to the gallery. Videos are handled the same way: Built in file browser, select and then upload. It converts the video in flv... all you do is upload, it does the rest. You can also pull in videos from Youtube and Facebook and images from Flickr and can link to your account on all those sites... and pull in the files from there. For a stand alone all-in-one, it does what I need. It needs a bit of tweaking, but nothing horrible.

Now, for images within content: I use FCK, and have had no problems at all uploading using the FCK file browser, straight onto my server (no ftp needed). I can even create folders once into the server, resize, alt text... all from within FCK. I'm sure you installed correctly, but remember that you do need to grab the module: http://drupal.org/project/fckeditor , then grab the editor: http://www.fckeditor.net/download. Remember to configure the settings in FCK: admin/settings/fckeditor . Make sure you edit the admin settings: admin/settings/fckeditor/edit/Admin . Also, while there, check your file browser settings.

This is all I did, and it works like a charm. I didn't put anything in my sites/modules file: I just dropped fck into the modules file itself, as with all my modules. I tried TinyMCE and TinyTiny, but had some issues. FCK is the best all around that I've found.

I updated our site to Drupal, and am not completely finished with it, but here it is if you wanna take a look at some of the content with images:
www.theparanormalsociety.org and www.theparanormalsociety.org/whats-on-tv will show and image header that I just uploaded with FCK.

And here are the videos and photos, so you can see how Kaltura looks and works:
Images - http://theparanormalsociety.org/kaltura/entries?filter=2&cwurl=
Videos - http://theparanormalsociety.org/kaltura/entries?filter=1&cwurl=

I know you probably did the configuring, but I just wanted to run through it in case you forgot something.

Hope this helps... and good luck!

Chris
www.theparanormalsociety.org

Nice work., thanks~!

AshokanKid - February 12, 2009 - 17:13

Hi Chris;

Thanks SO much for taking the time to lay out what is working for you. I am having similar long nights and lottsa hours making my own Drupal stuff work. I have almost a dozen sites to update here myself and like any self respecting web site, they ALL need images (and perhaps video?).

I went over to Acquia to see what all they include in their own version of Drupal (Modules) and even tested a version very briefly, but found that they have a lot more extra stuff that I do not need AND that crashed my shared hosting providers minimal PHP allocation.

Back to a base Drupal install with only the few modules that I need for now AND will now be trying the ones that you advise and specify on your helpful post above. I'd like to be able to embed and use video as well as static images or gallery so this is great.

Is your own site a template / theme of your own design or was it something formulated from a pre-made theme? For now we are using DLed themes and altering them to suit, but eventually will be working on making our own base theme to customize.

Here were my own pleas for Drupla Core Image Support and some helpful Community suggestions; http://drupal.org/node/371582

Thanks again; AK

Thanks!

sgprs - February 12, 2009 - 21:54

Hey Ak,

Thanks, and glad I could provide some helpful info.

Yeah, Drupal IS a monster to learn. The curve is definitely ten times more difficult than anything out there. It would be nice if things could be made to be a bit easier, especially for those that have limited knowledge of CMS. I'm afraid that some may get frustrated and just decide to drop Drupal and go with something that seems easier, like Mambo. That's unfortunate because Drupal truly is really awesome... and I'd never go with another CMS now, even if I hadn't shed so much blood and sweat :)

I'm still learning, and still there are many things that I don't fully understand: simple things like Taxonomy (yep, it's true). Some of my clients want to use it for thier sites, and sometimes I recommend against it, depending on what they need. If it's something simple, and they don't need the power of Drupal, I usually tell 'em to go with Mambo, basically becasue it will be easier for them to maintain. If I do the maintaining, I will use Drupal.

Anyway, for the paranormal site: It's actually a combination of different things. I searched for days to find a Drupal template that I liked. What I found was several that were nice, but not one that had exactly what I needed. What I did was to start with the admire theme, then I basically took it apart and put it back together using some custom stuff and some stuff from other themes that I liked.

So yeah, it pretty much a custom theme. It took forever to get it to where it is now, mainly because themes in Drupal are a different world compared to other CMS's.

Thanks for the link, it helped a lot.

One thing that's for sure: The support here on the forum for Drupal is BY FAR much better than any other CMS. Everyone here is awesome.

Good luck!
Chris

FCKeditor and IMCE

DocMartin - March 6, 2009 - 06:57

Just found this thread; after looking re using IMCE to create folders for users [not sure it can do so for each indiv user I'd like to ]

Agree Drupal should be stronger re editors and images: indeed seems old-timers into basic text, and no images, much as THIS site [as mentioned above]

Haven't read all posts here, but adding a bit of info lest helpful.

I too have tried several editors and image adding methods.
For articles, come to favour FCKeditor and IMCE.
[for photos to use separately, as in gallery, indeed not so sure re solution; have menalto gallery, and maybe changes there will lead to something better w Drupal; tho views etc should be able to do something. Sadly, efforts seem to be rather scattergun, w various galleries]

Anyway, FCKeditor can be a nuisance, but doesn't really take long to set up if go right route. [but if wrong, can think it's named as often shouting about this FCKing editor!] Indeed must download FCKeditor separately, and include in module, which I'd think better named FCKeditormodule or something.
One thing is that need to have users assigned to groups that can use FCKeditor - even the chief admin [user1] doesn't have permission straight away, which is odd.
Then, can choose re "profiles" for FCKeditor: for yourself and important folk, aim for Drupal full. Maybe use the Advanced profile that comes w the module.
Need to select file browser: use FCKeditor's own browser [though for this seems have to edit a setting in FCKeditor file(s), or more readily enabled IMCE. I'm not so sure re benefits of IMCE for this, beyond being able to create thumbnails during upload if needed.

Then, can browse inside the site's /files/ folder.
Inside this folder, you may want to create more folders - perhaps one for images, maybe more within this. so might be files/images/
I've
Permissions can be an issue here - I wonder if get server error if don't have permission to read/write folders. Permission 777 may be worth a try.

With IMCE, also need to assign profiles to user groups, though at least user1 works right away.
Using this, choose it as browser in FCKeditor options.
There's directory creation tool; just trying, and not obvious if it can create folder for each user. Till now, though, I've been main contributor, so haven't worried about this.

Anyway, once all this is working, becomes pretty easy to browse for existing photos, or to upload them; and to then insert in stories etc you are editing - options for, say, image appearing to left of text, or to right [best to set a couple of pixels horizontal space - padding - if so]. Can add alt text, too.
With image inserted, can resize it by dragging corners w mouse. - as yet, I haven't gone avenue of adding thumbnail, allowing users to then click and see full image w Lightbox, which I think possible but maybe overkill.
Doesn't make for real fancy designs, but works well enough I think.

Ah, and one other thing - you also need to choose an Input Format that does not strip images out of text!
[Long seemed a darn nuisance that such a thing happened with default Drupal - but I've lately had people try to post comments with links that have no text, set at zero pixels, so invisible if don't see code. Some crafty nasty blighters out there, hence all that filtering]
For yourself, as user1, Full HTML should be fine.

Reading this, might seem a faff, but set up new site last night, and getting fckeditor and imce working took only minutes.
Once they are working, creating articles is pretty easy; you can make real progress w Drupal, and move on... On to being baffled by some more modules etc, but also thinking it's good when tags working, related articles showing, menu links created automatically [jquerymenu; a new one for me] and so on.

____________________________
DocMartin and Hong Kong Outdoors

 
 

Drupal is a registered trademark of Dries Buytaert.