Closed (fixed)
Project:
Content Profile
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
User registration module
Priority:
Critical
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
12 Feb 2009 at 15:45 UTC
Updated:
12 Jun 2009 at 12:30 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
tsi commentedHaving the same issue, subscribing.
Comment #2
tsi commentedWell, nothing ?
Comment #3
andreiashu commentedI can confirm this.
I looked into content_profile_registration module and i suspect that the
content_profile_registration_user_register_submitfunction is to blame for this. But at the moment I don't have a solution. I'll look into this later when i'll have some more time.Comment #4
tsi commentedThis is a really big issue, because this is the only way for me to automatically create a node for every registered user,
I am using advanced profile kit, and if a user don't have a node created, then the comment wall of the user's page is not created.
any fix for this anytime soon ?
Thanks.
Comment #5
Anonymous (not verified) commentedAbsolutely. Im having just the same problem!
Does any one have a solution?
I would really appreciate one!
Thanks
Comment #6
erdubya commentedsame problem.... tried to go back a version, but beta2 doesn't have user registration module... subscribing.
Comment #7
charos commentedsame issue here.
Comment #8
Witch commentedi have the same problem. does anybody found a solution?
Comment #9
daneyuleb commentedSubscribe. Is anyone taking a look at this problem? (I tried, but beyond my meager abilities...)
Comment #10
jax commentedThe problem is that when using the content_profile_user_registration it does not follow the comment/publishing/etc. settings defined for the content type. When you put the default to "not pulished" the node will be published after the user has created an account.
Comment #11
Witch commentedso whats the solution for this issue?
Comment #12
darrellhq commentedI really need a solution for this. subscribe
Comment #13
bueler commentedI am having the same issue. I have to manually enable comments every time somebody new registers.
Comment #14
Witch commentedI am using the latest dev version!
Where is the maintainer? Why he does not respond?
Comment #15
Witch commenteddisabling content fields on registration seems to work for me.
After registration a user should create his profile. this seems to work.
Comment #16
shunshifu commentedsubscribing
I need this too. Yes it does work with content fields on registration disabled but I need that. Hopefully there's a solution soon. This is much needed.
Thanks for the module though. It's quite helpful.
Phil
Comment #17
jahn_yah commentedsubscribing. this is urgently needed for our site.
Comment #18
tsi commentedCan we find another solution ? maybe we can do it using rules ?
Comment #19
Witch commentedThis Module has a high responsibility. So where is the maintainer?
Comment #20
tsi commentedIf you are tired of waiting for this issue to be solved just do it with rules !
works like a charm.
Comment #21
Witch commentedhi tsi,
can you give us a short instruction?
Comment #22
tsi commentedSure,
first of all, you should have Rules and the latest Dev of Token.
then:
1. Create a new rule, I called it uprofile_creation
2. The event is when "user account has been created".
3. You need only one action - "Add new content"
4. Set author as "registered user"
5. I also set the title to [account:user] so the title is the user name but it can be anything you want
6. Then set the content type to be created, in my case 'uprofile'.
and thats it, if you are still having problems I can give you my exported rule, but this is really very very simple.
Good luck !
Comment #23
malc_b commentedI follow this so far but I'm confused about the item at the bottom of action the variable XXX setting, with label and machine readable label. What are these for and what do they do?
The other thing I want to do is to force data collection from the new use so that has to be in the profile form. I then want to pull that into this uprofile to display it there. I think for that I need a view to grab the data then cck to pull the view in, unless there is a simpler way?
Comment #24
Witch commentedtsi! thats it!
Comment #25
Witch commentedtsi, when somebody changes the title of his content profile a new node will be build instead of repleace the old one. a user is able to create as many uprofile content he wants!
Comment #26
tsi commentedNot in my case...
you meen it creates a new blank node ?
Do you have "Use this content type as a content profile for users" checked at the bottom of /admin/content/node-type/uprofile ?
Did you set the author of the node as "registered user" (#4 in the list) ?
Comment #27
Witch commentedyep i did both :\
i am very stressed because the maintainer says nothing to this issue for weeks...
Comment #28
dragonwize commentedConfirmed this is an issue. It is caused by the nodeapi prepare hook not firing which is what comment.module uses to load the default from the content type settings. There are other settings besides just comments that need to be defaulted so I have use the node api the same as the the content create form does.
In content_profile_registration.module > content_profile_registration_user_register_validate() > approx. line 136 add these two lines:
Your resulting function should look like this:
I'm not rolling a patch for this as it is simple and I don't feel like re-rolling it until it gets in.
Comment #29
off commenteddragonwize, I just tested you code on several live sites.. this works good! Thanks!!
Comment #30
dragonwize commentedGreat OFF. Thanks for testing.
Please do not set issues to fixed though unless you started the issue or you are a maintainer of the project. The issue is not "fixed" until code is committed to the repository. If you would like to let it be known that the patch has been properly tested and reviewed you can set the status to "Reviewed and tested by the community". If your review is not a complete review with understanding of the code then just leave the status at "needs review" so that other may review it so that it will continue to get more people reviewing the code for accuracy.
Thank you for marking your feedback though so that we know it is working for people. Also report back if you find any issues related to this.
Comment #31
Witch commentedi will test it today and will inrorm you.
Comment #32
Witch commentedit seems to work! what a good message!
Comment #33
fagoI've incorporated+committed the fix, please test.
Comment #34
off commentedworks great )