Feature requests...
| Project: | Revision Moderation |
| Version: | 6.x-1.0-alpha1 |
| Component: | Miscellaneous |
| Category: | feature request |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | active |
Jump to:
Hi!
Promising but not quite meeting my needs yet; maybe I'm missing something.
- Only the administrator can approve revisions and view/modify the revision queue. I wish other roles could have this ability.
- There is no way to allow a role to decide if a revision should be saved right away, or put in the moderation queue.
The scenario I would like to be able to setup:
- One admin,
- An 'editor' role,
- The admin allow the editor role to decide if a revision can be saved right away, or put in the moderation queue,
- The admin allows the editor role to access the moderation queue.
The rational here is: editors work together and have the same "rights"; most of the time they want their revisions to be saved right away, but sometimes they want other editors to approve their revisions by putting them in the revision queue (or another editor could create a revision that he would want the original editor to approve first).
Thanks!
#1
Also, need the following:
- Integration with Views 2 for moderated revisions, including filtering out information from moderated revisions, ability to view moderated revisions on a per user basis.
- Ability to schedule revision publication
- Ability to mass promote moderated revisions.
We are definitely willing to consult, test.
#2
Another Views-related request: Ability to develop a relationship with a root book node and revisions for every node that is part of the book.