I upgraded Imagefield to 6.x-3.0-beta1 and FileField to 6.x-3.0-beta1.

All of my lovely functionality that I had going with ShadowBox gallery in Views just got borked in a big way.

I noticed this after moving my site to a different server and updating all of my modules. My galleries became non functional.

So, I went back to my development server were the galleries were working. I upgraded my modules and Bingo I borked them with the module upgrade.

Sorry to be informing you of the bad news. Shadowbox, ImageField, and Views were all playing nice and the last version of ImageField (6.x-3.0-beta1) appears to have killed it.

This is a bummer.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#2 gallery-view-settings.png90.31 KBdadderley

Comments

psynaptic’s picture

psynaptic commented

Thanks for the heads-up dougzilla. Maybe there was a change to imagefield that we need to account for in Shadowbox. Any more info?

dadderley’s picture

dadderley commented
StatusFileSize
new gallery-view-settings.png90.31 KB

As I say it was working and when I did the imagefield and filefield upgrades it croaked. I did not move any directories around or upload any new pictures or install any other modules. This upgrade borked the gallery on one install then I did the upgrade on a clone (another dev site) just to test. Sure enough, the result was the same. I believe that imagefield has undergone some fairly big changes.

I just noticed that there is a brand new release of imagefield, 6.x-3.0-beta2. Perhaps this will cure the problem. I will test it and let you know.

I attached a screen shot of the views setting that I was using for my gallery.

psynaptic’s picture

psynaptic commented

Thanks dougzilla, I am holding off upgrading imagefield and filefield on all site now!

dadderley’s picture

dadderley commented

I tested again using Imagefield 6.x-3.0-beta2.
This has no effect.

Yes, hold off on the upgrade.

Firetracker’s picture

Firetracker commented

Any news on Shadowbox being fixed?

Cheers
Zap

magnestyuk’s picture

magnestyuk commented

I just tried it out and not tested it thoroughly, but it works if you set shadowbox to handle all image links automatically, and then in your view select the "your_imagefield_here linked to image" option, instead of one of the numerous shadowbox native options.

By the way, I'm using 6.x-2.x-dev, but I suppose this would work in 6.x-2.1 as well.

dadderley’s picture

dadderley commented

Yes but no lovely shadowbox gallery navigation between images.

Firetracker’s picture

Firetracker commented

Yeah I need the galleries. I can theme my way around it. But that means doing a load of theming!

And I don't really want to start hacking my install of the shadowbox module (best lightbox for drupal by far!!!)

psynaptic - do you have any idea when this will be looked at - might make the theming decision more attractive if it's going to be a while.

Cheers Zap

Firetracker’s picture

Firetracker commented

bump!

psynaptic’s picture

psynaptic commented

I've just installed Imagefield and Filefield 6.x-3.0-rc1 and it seems to be ok. Can you give me steps to reproduce?

Firetracker’s picture

Firetracker commented

Hi psynaptic,

I'm running Shadowbox, 6.x-2.1, Imagefield and Filefield 6.x-3.0-rc1 and VIews 6.x-2.3.

When selecting any of the shadowbox formatter options for an imagefield in the View no results are returned. This seems to be an issue since Imagefield and Filefield 6.x-3.0-beta1 was released.

Cheers
Zap

dadderley’s picture

dadderley commented

Hi psynaptic

This might be useful information for de-bugging.
According to this post, http://drupal.org/node/422740 , the imagefield 6.x-3.0-rc1 release seems to have borked some lightbox and thickbox functionality as well.

good luck with it.

psynaptic’s picture

psynaptic commented

I have just updated my test site to:

  • Drupal 6.10
  • Content Construction Kit (CCK) 6.x-2.2
  • FileField 6.x-3.0-rc1
  • ImageField 6.x-3.0-rc1
  • ImageCache 6.x-2.0-beta8

I have found the display options on the node pages to work fine but views displays no output. I am looking into this now.

psynaptic’s picture

psynaptic commented
Assigned: Unassigned » psynaptic
Status: Active » Needs review

Ok, it looks like a line in shadowbox_field_formatter_info(): 'multiple values' => CONTENT_HANDLE_MODULE was causing this issue. I have deleted all instances of the 'multiple values' key in the formatters and it seems to be fixed.

I also noticed that 'field types' => array('image', 'filefield') references image types but I think imagefield only uses filefields now so I am changing it to just 'field types' => array('filefield').

Can you guys download the latest DRUPAL-6--2 from CVS and test this for me?

Firetracker’s picture

Firetracker commented

Hi psynaptic,

Downloaded and tested and......working a treat!!! Nice one.

Thanks for getting this sorted and thanks for such a brilliant module!.

Cheers
Zap

psynaptic’s picture

psynaptic commented

Thanks for testing. I'll hold off on making a full release until more people have tested and confirm it works.

There are a few things I want to work in from my TODO list too so this will be an ideal opportunity.

dadderley’s picture

dadderley commented

Thanks psynaptic
Just did a test with the updated dev version and it is working again.
You Rock!

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented
Version: 6.x-2.1 » 6.x-2.x-dev
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

I was just having the same problems on my site (using 6.x-2.1). I upgraded to 6.x-2.x-dev and it works perfectly!

Firetracker’s picture

Firetracker commented

Hi,

I think this patch might have a knock on effect in the cck formatters - doesn't seem to be working in there when I select any of the the shadowbox options.

Cheers
Zap

psynaptic’s picture

psynaptic commented
Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Closed (fixed)

Closed to clear queue. As far as I am aware this is fixed.