Closed (works as designed)
Project:
Painter
Version:
6.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Operations
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
26 Mar 2009 at 06:03 UTC
Updated:
27 May 2009 at 22:47 UTC
Hey,
Just wondering if you would mind clarifying how your module compares with Imagecache (http://drupal.org/project/imagecache), and what it aims to do differently? From the description of your module it sounds somewhat similar?
Thanks!
Jeff
Comments
Comment #1
Scheepers de Bruin commentedHi Jeff
Imagecache manipulates existing images. Painter focusses on image creation based on content, as well as manipulation.
There are some similarities indeed, discovered in retrospect, as the painter can be used to replicate imagecache functionality.
Imagecache was a thumbnail tool when I started on the painter. I wanted something I could draw with.
scheepers
Comment #2
jeff h commentedPerhaps some similarities then with http://drupal.org/project/signwriter... but I will stop bugging you with comparisons and just give it a go! :)
Jeff
Comment #3
Scheepers de Bruin commentedIt's all good.
It shares similarities with both, I'd say. Where signwriter is great for text and Imagecahe is great for manipulation painter is more suited to generating graphics (including text) based on changing data.
Buttons, tabs, navigation etc have always been limited to hardcoded imagery or simple text. I wanted pretty graphical primary links and custom buttons that would adapt to the site content automagically ;)
In all honesty, the text, scaling and cropping functionality of painter was added for the sake of completeness, and not meant to compete with Imagecache or signwriter at all. I think the imagecache, signwriter and the painter each have their own niche.
Thanks for giving it a go :)
scheepers
Comment #4
Scheepers de Bruin commented