Postponed (maintainer needs more info)
Project:
Comment Moderation
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
10 Apr 2009 at 17:15 UTC
Updated:
29 Apr 2009 at 01:24 UTC
Comments
Comment #1
dag- commentedYou do not have to use it in a block. But the block is indeed the entry-point to access the interface. I guess we could change that, but the settings page is not the correct location for it. David added a patch today to allow one to access the comment_moderation interface via the approval queue, which is uch more convenient for those people that do not want to use the block.
I myself like to have that block (visible for only me) so I have a clear view of how many comments have been added.
The filtering by date is less useful in my opinion, because the aim is to clear the approval queue. I don't really see what the point would be to go back to a specific date. Maybe I need more information to understand how you would use this.
Comment #2
dag- commentedComment #3
kmontyMost of my concerns will be addressed in the other thread I start #431362: Expanding the functionality scope of comment_moderation module or create a new one? In reality, the block is appropriate for just dealing with moderated comments / date filter is not necessary. In short, I wanted to leverage this module to be able to delete spam comments easily but not use comment moderation (allowing anonymous posting directly to the site).
We should refocus this thread to the empty admin page, which should either have some options in it or be removed.
Comment #4
dag- commentedRight. The consensus was to remove it for the stable release (which was forgotten), but in the meantime I came up with the first feature request which requires a configuration option. (jeuj \o/)
More information from #447954: Add configuration option to report spam-type to Mollom