Conflict CA and Organic Groups OG Access
tenx - April 11, 2009 - 22:34
| Project: | Content Access |
| Version: | 6.x-1.1 |
| Component: | Miscellaneous |
| Category: | support request |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | active |
Jump to:
Description
I have both CA module OG Access module installed on my site . ever since i enabled CA module . all OG home pages which were private and could only be accessible by its users are now public and accessible by every user. How can i get CA to play nice with the og access module .
#1
Try lowering the priority. Please report back if it works for you.
#2
Hi there,
I have already lower the priority to 1, but still not working
#3
subscribe - I have the same problem.
I use OG 6.x-2.0-rc3.
OG has an option for each group: "List in groups directory". When I enable this option all content will be shown also to non group users. I tried the weight/priority for goups and group content -10 and +10. No success.
When I disable the OG option "List in groups directory" and use priority -10 for all groups content type it works fine. But with this option non group members don´t see that the group excist and can´t request membership.
Any ideas from your side?
#4
Did you (maintainer) ever thought about having a selection within CA to which content type it applies?
#5
Good news. I seems to work now.
What I did: disable the module, enabled it again, rebuilt permission, set CA priority (weight) to -10 for content type groups (the groups itself) AND for all content types that can be used withing groups and set the permissions to the specific roles.
Hope this can be helpful for others too.
Thanks for the nice module - it is really of great help!
#6
I just tried the same including the troubleshooting but the authentified user could still see group nodes he had no view rights for.
Only when I set the group node Content Access weight to +10 (!) it worked in my case. Hmmm.
#7
Yep, I'd say it depends what you want: Should organic groups access system or the content access system should be priorisized?
Anyway I leave the issue open so others interested in this can find it.
#8
Well. And what if I want to only deny access using both modules? If one of them have denied access, then there is no access to node. And If it didn't happened --- you are welcome to view it.