When getting the attributes to request, i used a confusing variable name.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| openid_client_ax_fix_confusing_variable_name.patch | 1.7 KB | aron novak |
When getting the attributes to request, i used a confusing variable name.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| openid_client_ax_fix_confusing_variable_name.patch | 1.7 KB | aron novak |
Comments
Comment #1
aron novakThe first post is too laconic.
So when we get the attributes from openid_cp_field (or from other implementor, via a hook) what we will request from the provider site, the variable that stored the list of attributes was called $mapping, although it contained something else. It's really confusing because $mapping is used in definitely different meanings. And that variable does not contain the mapping itself.
Comment #2
alex_b commented$attributes is better than $mapping in this context. RTBC from my point of view.
Comment #3
alex_b commentedThis is in Darren's court now.
Comment #4
darren.ferguson commented$attributes is good with me also, since it is attribute exchange :-)
Comment #5
alex_b commentedCommitted.