Active
Project:
Apache Solr Views
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Minor
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
24 Apr 2009 at 00:44 UTC
Updated:
25 Sep 2014 at 20:57 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
Scott Reynolds commentedPlease note this is just the block. Sorts work properly though the Views Interface, just the sort block doesn't work.
Comment #2
Scott Reynolds commentedComment #3
jrabeemer commentedI can confirm the "Sort By" block shows up empty here.
Comment #4
domidc commentedAny luck a patch exists somewhere to enable this?
Comment #5
torgospizzaSubbing.
Comment #6
dpalmer commentedSubscribing
Comment #7
torgospizzaAny update on this? Does anyone have this block working? Would love to have sorting enabled this week. Started to take a look at it myself, but I'm a noob when it comes to Views (and solr, so combined it's a double whammy).. any help is appreciated.
Comment #8
nally commentedsubscribe
Comment #9
nally commentedI'm not sure what the correct approach here would be, but I've observed that setting a Sort Order and then Exposing it (within Views) doesn't add the sort to the "Apache Solr Core: Sorting" block.
My route around for now has been to do that (to expose the sort via the usual Views controls) and then (once exposed) a block will be defined that collects whichever things have been exposed (filters, sorts, etc.)
I know that this is not the solution that this thread seeks, but I include my experience here because of the lack of description for others who follow this way.
Comment #10
BeaPower commentedIs there anyway that this will be implemented?
Comment #11
i.gajic commentedIt's been over year and half since this issue is reported. Will this issue be fixed in reasonable time? Is there any 3rd party solution to this issue ?
Comment #12
Amy_M commentedSubscribing
Comment #13
dirtysteak commentedChanging priority to major because this causes a complete loss of functionality from the standard Apache Solr module...its killing me that we can't use the two together!
We would be willing to put up $150 towards getting this fixed with a patch, anyone else willing to pony up if it will spur development??
Comment #14
LetUsBePrecise commentedWe are also facing same problem. Not sure what can be done here. Any help on this please.
Comment #15
geoffreyr commentedI've had a go at patching this to try and make it work in at least Views 3.
Here are the changes I've made so far:
Unfortunately, this implementation doesn't allow for multiple sorts, so there's definitely room for improvement. (I'm not sure whether apachesolr module's sort block allows for multiple sorts, could anyone shed some light on this for me please?)
Comment #16
geoffreyr commented...and here's the patch. Sorry about that.
Comment #17
picxelplay commentedapachesolr.module's sort block doesn't allow multiple sorts either. Everything seems fine to me.
Comment #18
picxelplay commentedAny progress yet on getting this to work 'per view'?
Comment #19
smd_ksu commentedHow do you remove certain sorts from the block now that it appears? I tried the code below with no luck.
Comment #20
shaneonabike commented+1
Comment #21
Anonymous (not verified) commentedHave a look at http://drupal.org/node/715276
Comment #22
benschaaf commentedThis patch fails on the latest DEV release, and this is very much still an issue.
I am going to try to patch this manually, as the patch is quite old now.
Has anyone been able to get this to work? Thanks!
Comment #23
toemaz commentedApplied the patch on an old dev release and things worked out for me. Don't have the latest dev running, so I can't make a new patch for now.
Comment #24
torgospizzaThis problem appears to still exist in 7.x as well.
Changing statuses to reflect this. If anyone has any working solutions, I'd be happy to test them as this is pretty critical.
Comment #25
miroslavbanov commentedWell, the integration of apachesolr_views with apachesolr_search is problematic, Apachesolr module implementation of sort is also problematic.
I can suggest one of two options:
I'm demoting this to minor, because the focus here is *views* implementation to be solid.