Closed (duplicate)
Project:
Secure Pages
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Critical
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
24 Apr 2009 at 13:00 UTC
Updated:
20 Jan 2012 at 23:14 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
kambui commentedAny fix for this ?
We are having the same issue
Comment #2
kambui commentedThis is a critical issue for us, using boost 6.x-1.0
Comment #3
vacilando commentedSame problem.
Comment #4
Anonymous (not verified) commentedI'll investigate this problem over the weekend
Comment #5
Lloyd commentedAny update on this? I'm having the same issue.
Comment #6
jaybee1001 commentedHi - has there been any progress to identify the cause of this issue?
Many Thanks
JB
Comment #7
mkeplinger commentedAny status on this? I think that all that needs to be done is to change the default "weight" of the module to be less than Boost's weight. Currently the weight of boost is -90.
You can also temporarily set this by using the module weights module and setting the "weight" of the Secure Pages module to be -91
using the Util Module: http://drupal.org/project/util
If I knew how to make a patch I would. But basically, this can be fixed by modifying the weight of the module. SEE: http://drupal.org/node/110238
Comment #8
jm.federico commentedThis is not a Drupal problem, is an .htaccess config problem
Boost serves the pages from a static cache, Drupal doesn't get called. If you want the page to be served using http, you have to create a redirect rule on your .htaccess file
Changing the weight on the modules will have no effect, as I mentioned, Drupal doesn't get called. Apache (or whatever server you use) is serving the page directly.
This issue should be moved to the BOOST queue. (Leaving here, will leave up to the Developers to decide)
Comment #9
mikeytown2 commenteddev version of boost will not try to serve the page from the cache if protocol is https. This is a htaccess issue.
Comment #10
patrickroma commentedAny News on this issue?
Comment #11
grendzy commentedI don't think this can be fixed by securepages, because the current folder structure of boost doesn't include the protocol in the cache key. Example:
cache/normal/example.com/_.html
I'm closing this as a duplicate, because a new folder structure has been proposed that would account for the protocol.
#1070048: New folder structure