Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Composite Layout
Version:
6.x-1.0-beta7
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
29 Apr 2009 at 11:22 UTC
Updated:
29 Apr 2009 at 12:00 UTC
Hey - tnx for a totally great, simple module!
Ehm, what about making a choice for a four column flexible grid? I know this may be a circular argument (how bout 52?) but yeah, there are lots of designs that would benefit from that option. My designer is working with a grid concept, maybe an even better sollution would be a completely flexible thing, like when you draw a table in a wordprocesseor - but that's maybe outside the scope of composite layout?
Best,
Simon
Comments
Comment #1
bengtan commentedHi,
A four column flexigrid would be extremely painful to implement because the complexity of CSS multi-column layouts is exponential and just explodes with four columns.
With three columns, I have to handle up to 6 permutations of individual columns being on or off.
With four columns, I have to handle up to 24. Sorry, too hard, not interested, unless I'm getting paid to put myself through this pain :)