Confusion about file version of scanner.module in 5.x-2.1 vs. 5.x-2.0-beta1
Linxor - May 3, 2009 - 05:49
| Project: | Search and Replace Scanner |
| Version: | 5.x-2.1 |
| Component: | Code |
| Category: | support request |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | active |
Jump to:
Description
I was updating my codebase today when I noticed that for some odd reason, the file versions for scanner.module for 2.1 is actually older than 2.0-beta1.
2.1 has a version 1.3.2.1
2.0-beta1 has a version 1.4
And if you do a diff between both files, there are a lot of changes in each.
Was this intentional? Which is the correct file we should be using?
If 1.3.2.1 is the recommended file, I highly suggest you update it to 1.4.1 or something so that the version numbers accurately increment from the previous releases.
Thanks for such an awesome module!
#1
Hi Linxor. The version numbers you're referring to are internal file revision numbers automatically inserted by CVS when I check in or tag files. I'm not sure why the 2.0 release was on the 1.3.x track rather than following the 1.4 track started by the beta -- it's certainly possible I checked things in out of order at the time, or that I changed my mind about the beta and made my updates for the 2.0 release in a different track.
But that said, the external revision numbers -- 5.x-2.0-beta1 and 5.x-2.0 -- are the ones to pay attention to when upgrading. I double-checked all the files and the 5.x-2.0 release is indeed the official release.
If everything works for you with 5.x-2.0, then use it! :) If not, let me know!