field_sql_storage_field_storage_write() calls field_read_field(), which reads from the DB.
I don't think there's any reason not to use the recommended field_info_field() instead, which fetches from the cached info.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| field_storage_write.patch | 950 bytes | yched |
Comments
Comment #1
bjaspan commentedNo reason I can think of.
Comment #2
webchickCommitted, thanks!
(first Field API patch I understood first try ;))
Comment #3
yched commentedwow, that was fast.