The crossref_unix_parser ends up concatenating all the DOIs returned by crossref.
For instance, looking up 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00614.x
gives a doi of
10.1111/jpp.2008.71.issue-210.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00614.x

which is three concatenated dois coming from the full journal doi, the journal issue doi, then the article doi.

To replicate this issue, use the doi lookup on the doi I provided, then look at the automatically populated DOI field

Comments

cowsandmilk’s picture

just a correction to what I said, it's two concatenated DOIs in this case, but there are other cases when there are 3.

rjerome’s picture

Now the question is... if you had to keep only one, which one would you want. I'm guessing the article DOI?

cowsandmilk’s picture

yes, the article DOI would be best.

rjerome’s picture

Status: Active » Fixed

Ok, this now defaults to the article DOI and ignores the DOI from any publications in which the article is contained.

Ron.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.