local images not displaying in Feedburner feeds - filter order wrong?
decibel.places - June 11, 2009 - 13:53
| Project: | Pathologic |
| Version: | 6.x-2.0-beta19 |
| Component: | Miscellaneous |
| Category: | support request |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | closed |
Jump to:
Description
I have read previous issues about this, checked and rechecked my Pathologic filter settings, but I am still not getting the local images in my Feedburner feeds. Links and images on other sites displayed in my posts are fine.
On Full HTML and Filtered HTML filters, Pathologic has the highest weight and is at the bottom of the rearrange page, but when I view the filters, the Url Filter is placed after Pathologic. In the PHP Code filter, I am not using the Url Filter, but it's unchecked box is also below Pathologic... even when I turn them on and move them up in the order they still come after Pathologic (I remembered to turn them off).
So, I am not confident that Pathologic is actually coming last... perhaps that is the problem?
#1
The position of the filters on the rearrange page and on the selection page are independent of each other, so don't worry about that.
Could you link me to your FeedBurner feed and to the original feed (the one that FeedBurner is importing)?
#2
http://feeds2.feedburner.com/netsperience
http://feedproxy.google.com/netsperience
I notice that the image area is totally blank without a link.
When I receive an email through the Feedburner module's subscription, the image is missing but with correct dimensions outlined and link active
the feed I am burning is http://netsperience.org/rss.xml
the module's "burn" and "unburn" buttons don't exactly work; the edit page comes up but the values need to be added manually (with autocomplete)
when I unburn http://netsperience.org/rss.xml it displays the images
http://netsperience.org/blog/feed
has all images
#3
http://feeds2.feedburner.com/netsperience?format=xml
also displays all the images....
#4
correction:
http://feeds2.feedburner.com/netsperience?format=xml
displays all the images in Firefox only
in IE the image URL is http://feeds2.feedburner.com/files/images/LIWebDevelopmentExperts19detai... instead of http://netsperience.org/files/images/LIWebDevelopmentExperts19detail.jpg
image doesn't display in Opera either
#5
Looking at a post which has a broken image in a feed, I can see that Pathologic isn't working on it; its path isn't absolute, with a domain. Either Pathologic is not configured or misconfigured, or you're inserting it into the post in a way such that Pathologic isn't acting upon it. This will happen if the first character is a slash, as it is here, because Pathologic considers that to already be an absolute path.
#6
I am using FCKeditor to insert the images, I think it puts the slash in when it is a local URL
isn't there a way to configure Pathologic to process that? I have now tried adding "/" to the configuration for Pathologic in the input filters to consider that path local - will that work?
I tried uploading images through FCK also uploading to /files/images by ftp and supplying the URL - which is how I inserted the image in the post you reference.
Why would Firefox display the images and not IE or Opera in the same feeds?
#7
Well, the ideal solution would be to start writing your site content by hand instead of using FailCKeditor, but that's just the snobby programmer in me speaking.
Instead, check out #298558: Using Pathologic with TinyMCE, FCK, YUIEditor - The url "relative to root" , "/" problem , particularly comment #3. Marking as a dupe of that issue.
As for why Firefox behaves different from IE or Opera, that's beyond the scope of this issue queue and my knowledge.
#8
I already said I was trying that: "I have now tried adding "/" to the configuration for Pathologic in the input filters to consider that path local - will that work?"
and it seems to work! thanks!
couldn't Pathologic be improved to consider / a local path?
Regarding FCK I think it is a good tool, particularly for my clients who don't code, often I edit the source, but it is a productivity-enhancing feature. And it is very handy to be able to upload images directly in the RTE, rather than attach them and copy the URL or manually upload and link them...