Need for a master policy 'good community status' around which other policies can be drafted.

Here is what I am proposing for a open debate as a start for policy making on drupal.org

I think it is important that 'Drupal Community' word is given some credibility with a status like 'good status'.

Those with 'good status' should get support from community and those not having 'good status' can still be a member but can only get limited things done on drupal.org. 'good status' also brings accountability and responsibility for everyone so that they behave in fair, transparent manner.

Here are few scenarios : (Others can add more scenarios too)

1) Should a user-id have in his profile First Name, Last Name that is realistic to have a good member status?
2) If the profile associated with user-id does not have First Name, Last Name or has 'fake name' but doing good work would that id have a 'good status' ?
3) If Company 'corp' has different user-ids with 'corp', 'corp-user', 'corp-user1' being used by different team members rather than 'john' and 'geoff' would that be a good 'Drupal Community' status for Company 'corp' ?
4) If 1 person has multiple companies and uses his user-id to write about products of various companies and other useful posts, would that user-id and user have a good member status?
5) If Company 'corp' has a user-id 'corp' and that is used by team members to provide support in forums, contribute code on behalf of company, etc would this company have a good member status?
6) If 1 person with userid 'user-a' owns stake (major/minor) in multiple separate legal entities 'corp-a' and 'corp-b' (some may be in other countries) filing separate IT returns and for each entity there is different user-id would that be a good status for 'user-a', 'corp-a' and 'corp-b'
7) If in #6 above if 1 person uses all 1 id mostly and other 2 ids occasionally while other 2 ids are used by respective company directors, would that be given a good member status
8) If a user-id 'user-a' makes racial statements or targets 'user-b' or 'corp-a' would 'user-a' be a good member status?
9) Under the scenario listed in Q4) below - if a community member seeks clarification on posting of the user-a as to which 'hat' he put on while making the post and user-a does not reply to this - does this 'user-a' still have a 'good status' ?
10) Individual user-a with multiple user ids 'user-a', 'user-b'

Q1) Which of the above scenarios with usage of Drupal.org user-id are considered good community behavior?
Q2) Can anyone not having 'good status' continue to have advanced access rights like site-maintainer, etc on drupal.org? If so, under which scenarios?
Q3) Under which instance would any 'corp' lose a good member status ? If so, would they get privileges like front-page postings, advertisements on drupal.org or listing in services directory? If so, under which scenarios ?
Q4) If a user-id 'user-a' wears multiple hats like site-maintainer, drupal association board member or perm member, employee of a company, individual - how would his posts on drupal.org be interpreted i.e for which hat would it be under? If any of the actions from this 'user-a' are illegal, where would the onus fall?

I hope that there is some concrete policy is put for EACH of the above items.

Any-time an allegation is made and any user comments on it, effort must be made by that user to take inputs from both or at least the target and review any email / audio records. Putting blanket allegation would be illegal and the target should have right to protest and put it forward to 'review committee' and provide evidence that there has been a wrong allegation. The users who are putting wrong allegation needs to lose 'good status' if committee agrees of wrong-doing or that user-a has done it at personal level no matter what his/her stature is on drupal.org.

Those who are using email marketing campaigns will know 'good sender' practices. We do need 'good community status' policy. This policy should be first and governing policy around with other policies can be drafted.