Here we go
I've prepared to introspect nodereferrers details and right started away with fixing all coder complains for codestyle reasons. Going to review it soon deeper if codestyle is applied.
Provided patch changes all codestyle to recommendet situation as of now.
Hope you agree!
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | nodereferrer_codestyle.patch | 21.72 KB | miro_dietiker |
| #2 | nodereferrer_codestyle.patch | 21.17 KB | miro_dietiker |
| nodereferrer_codestyle.patch | 10.22 KB | miro_dietiker |
Comments
Comment #1
miro_dietikerready to review for sure!
Comment #2
miro_dietikerforgot -up options ... this time in unified diff style
Comment #3
stborchertHey.
Looks much better now but I still have some notes:
Where does these empty lines come from? And why this single "*" right before the comment start?
This is wrong. Use
TRUE(the constant) and not the string'TRUE'.happy patching :-)
Comment #4
miro_dietikerBack again.. Thanks for reviewing!
Corrected issues, SQL statement left untouched.
Comment #5
miro_dietikermy friend: status change ;-)
Comment #6
andypostThanx, I will commit this latter with #416332: Option in views to only display the number of referrers node ( count the child node of a cck node and display the number )
Comment #7
andypostThanx, commited to 6-dev
Comment #8
miro_dietikercool. thx.