Closed (fixed)
Project:
Boost
Version:
6.x-1.0-rc2
Component:
Caching logic
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
17 Aug 2009 at 04:03 UTC
Updated:
12 Sep 2009 at 01:40 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
mikeytown2 commentedThis has to do with Drupal and it's love for clearing the css cache. The next version of druapl, 6.14 should have some of this fixed since they accepted a patch I wrote #276615: If users goes to admin/build/themes and does not submit, anon users see cached pages with references to non-existent CSS. How to overcome this is to enable CSS & JS caching. You can enable that in the boost advanced settings. Let me know if this was the issue.
Comment #2
DocMartin commentedThanks; just enabled the css and js caching.
On quick check, looks fine; tho previously the cached pages looked fine, took time before I noticed the theme seemed absent. Hopefully this has solved it
Comment #3
mikeytown2 commentedchanged the defaults
Comment #4
mikeytown2 commentedcommitted
Comment #5
DocMartin commentedJust had the problem recur
Seems it takes time before cropping up.
I found that theme still AWOL even after disabling Boost; had to delete the Boost cache. Then, pages back to normal appearance.
[oddly, a page in Firefox still looked ok, even tho trouble in Safari and Opera, and I tried deleting Firefox browser cache]
I wonder if something to do with me still having recommended version of poormanscron, not the dev version (after reading advice re not using dev versions of Drupal modules; hoped a new release won't take long). Even though I have Boost set to ignore complete flushes, might the non-dev poormanscron delete the cached js and css , while leaving the .html files for pages?
- I did have quick look in cache folder for css and js, but didn't notice them.
Comment #6
mikeytown2 commentedThe 1.0 of poormanscron will mess up the cache; there is always a good reason for using a particular version of a module if it is documented.
#512314: premature cache flush when cron run via poormanscron 1.0; latest poormanscron dev fixes issue.
Comment #7
DocMartin commentedThanks again; just upgraded to dev version of poormanscron
Comment #8
DocMartin commentedLooking good since the change to dev of poormanscron