Do we want to support this for 1.0? I think it would be great, but not sure how feasible it is. I believe it was put in there by tmcw in the first place, probably before their fork, so I am not sure if that incentive is still there. If I get a chance, I will try to look at in more detail. Thoughts?
Sorry, marking as will not fix. It's taken a little bit to track the problem down, and since features support for 1.x is entirely different than 2.x, this isn't really a backporting task.
Comments
Comment #1
zzolo commentedJust an FYI, the features implementation has been commented out (not by me)
Comment #2
phayes commentedThat was me. It was breaking the entire site with a php error - so I just commented it out until someone could actually deal with it.
Comment #3
phayes commentedComment #4
zzolo commentedDo we want to support this for 1.0? I think it would be great, but not sure how feasible it is. I believe it was put in there by tmcw in the first place, probably before their fork, so I am not sure if that incentive is still there. If I get a chance, I will try to look at in more detail. Thoughts?
Comment #5
tmcw commentedThis could be caused by an API change on the features side. I'll review the code over the weekend.
Comment #6
tmcw commentedSorry, marking as will not fix. It's taken a little bit to track the problem down, and since features support for 1.x is entirely different than 2.x, this isn't really a backporting task.