Postponed
Project:
Bakery Single Sign-On System
Version:
3.x-dev
Component:
Metaphor compliance
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
10 Sep 2009 at 16:31 UTC
Updated:
16 May 2025 at 17:06 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
pwolanin commentedComment #2
stacie_a commentedi suppose bad cookies could be burnt cookies...
Comment #3
moshe weitzman commented*crumble* the bad cookie
Comment #4
pwolanin commentedcrumble is not bad - it shoudl be a verb that implies rejection somehow - crumble, spit, destroy, trash, reject...
Comment #5
stacie_a commentedtoss, burn, compost, dogfood, vomit, birdfood, flush?
Comment #6
gregglesI like the image of tossing the cookies best.
They are bad, my body rejects them.
Comment #7
coltraneI don't really care what the metaphor is. #6 works but I altered some of the comments to remove references to eating.
And I assume #6 was for 6.x-dev.
Comment #8
juliangb commentedMetaphor compliance is not important as long as you don't want anybody else to be able to understand (and contribute to) the code! Personally I dislike the fact we have so many metaphors when normal words would do.
I notice in #7 we are using destroy in the comments to explain toss. Could we therefore use destroy throughout? I think toss is a bit of an americanism in this context.
Comment #9
gregglesMakes sense to me.
I also agree that cutesy language in the code makes it harder to work on and we should consider a rewrite to get rid of all of the cutesy language.
Comment #10
coltraneRelated #953376: Removing cookie metaphors
and marking this postponed
Comment #11
purencool commentedComment #12
avpaderno