Attached screenshot. Version is // $Id: flexinode.module,v 1.70 2006/04/14 12:38:51 ber Exp $
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| flexinode_image_gallery_issue.gif | 3.74 KB | venkat-rk |
Attached screenshot. Version is // $Id: flexinode.module,v 1.70 2006/04/14 12:38:51 ber Exp $
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| flexinode_image_gallery_issue.gif | 3.74 KB | venkat-rk |
Comments
Comment #1
samc commentedProblem is field_gallery.inc and field_imagegal.inc both declare same name.
It'd be easy to create a patch to rename one of the modules, but before doing so can anyone who knows the history of these fields say whether one is intended to replace the other. Is the functionality duplicated? Should one be deprecated?
Comment #2
kayfish commentedI can't get either of them to work.
If I create a field with one of these types, it throws the following error:
Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/www/www/home/modules/flexinode/flexinode.module on line 576.
Comment #3
jo1ene commentedI have this happening too with the exception that I don't get a specific error. Any update on this?
Comment #4
Bèr Kessels commentedWe should remove one of these two from the contributions.
This makes me think: I want to *not* include the "contrib" .incs by default anymore. I want to fix this in head. Any comments?