Closed (fixed)
Project:
Table Wizard
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
20 Oct 2009 at 23:34 UTC
Updated:
23 Feb 2010 at 00:20 UTC
And while we're on the subject of confusing terminology (see #610054: Confusing terminology: Automatic vs. Manual), I'm not sure why the decision was made to rename "Foreign key" to "Available key". IMO, we can assume some level of database familiarity with the users of this module, so you should call this what you mean. Even the column is called "availablefk." :)
Can we please stick "Foreign" in the name somewhere so it's obvious what you're being asked to identify here?
Comments
Comment #1
moshe weitzman commentedThe word available is useful in conveying that more stuff becomes available to you use in Views. You get more relationships/tables available when composing the view. I have no strong opinion about whats the better terms.
Comment #2
mikeryanAs mentioned in #610054: Confusing terminology: Automatic vs. Manual, we can't count on Table Wizard users being database-literate. That being said, throwing the phrase "foreign key" in there somewhere will allow the db-literate to instantly understand what's going on...
Any thoughts for better terminology for the non-db-literate? The word "key" isn't really meaningful to them anyway...
Thanks.
Comment #3
mikeryanP.S. Only the db-literate will notice that the column is named "availablefk":-).
Comment #4
webchickHmmm... I guess what we really want to convey here is, "Make this column available to use when forming relationships." Too bad that table header can't be 50 feet wide. ;)
I'll give it some thought. It might also be too that some strategic application of contextual Advanced Help could solve this for all parties.
Comment #5
mikeryanHeader renamed to "Foreign key".