Reviewed & tested by the community
Project:
External Link Popularity
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
28 Oct 2009 at 04:52 UTC
Updated:
19 Mar 2015 at 23:20 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
sikjoy commentedAwesome - You rock!
Will get these tested and pushed to an updated version.
Best,
sicjoy
Comment #2
bwinett commentedGreat to hear you like my enhancements. These are my first contributions, so I'd be glad to hear if I've done anything that could be done better or more easily, or if I've done anything that doesn't jibe with the Drupal methodology.
Bill
Comment #3
momper commentedthanks - super - I am looking forward ...
Comment #4
bwinett commentedI've made another enhancement. Now you can specify whether you want the links in the node and/or the links in the blocks on the page tracked.
pop_links-20091214.zip contains everything.
pop_links-20091214-patches.zip contains only the patches to the already existing files. And these are patches since your version, not the version I included in my previous post.
Comment #5
momper commentedwill there be an .dev of external link popularity including this?
Comment #6
scott859 commentedsubscribing
Comment #7
momper commentedis it included in the current dev?
Comment #8
tekket commentedIt seems to be not included in the current dev version of module.
Comment #9
oferrero commentedWould it be posible to create a relationship that would relate a node's URL with a URL in the stats table?
This would allow to have all the clicks made to the url site-wide. It could be grouped by url, allowing views to display a list of url's by #clicks to the urls. I have been trying to get that working on my own, but so far I haven't been able to.
Comment #10
ianchan commented+1 for adding the enhanced functionality
Comment #11
marcoBauli commentedHowdy, would be possible with this integration to show the number of external clicks for each node? thx
ps: this does not look committed yet, but seems to work fine
Comment #12
bwinett commented