Closed (outdated)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
7.x-dev
Component:
user interface text
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
13 Nov 2009 at 22:13 UTC
Updated:
20 Aug 2014 at 22:34 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
aren cambre commentedComment #2
yoroy commentedyes that would be better
Comment #3
kyle_mathews commentedAnd here's a patch.
Not sure if this can still go in as it's changing the database column name + comment object. If needs be, I can keep homepage except for the UI text.
Comment #5
kyle_mathews commentedTrying again -- with a patch made from the root directory now.
Comment #7
elliotttf commentedThe patch above failed because (as kyle_mathews suggested) the homepage field was changed to webpage. I've rerolled with only changing the display of Homepage to Web site (as originally requested).
Comment #8
moshe weitzman commentedI actually think this change is neutral at best. Its rather odd for an app to ask me to name a 'web site' while leaving a comment. A homepage is a bit clearer, since it restricts the universe of web sites a lot.
Comment #9
aren cambre commentedNot only is homepage a non-preferred spelling of home page, the definitions of home page at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/home_page do not match what the field is really wanting.
Comment #10
dries commentedLol. I was just going to suggest we need to use website instead of web site.
Comment #11
moshe weitzman commentedIMO, the field "wants" the author's home page on the web, if he has one. That is, a page which tells me more about the author. A page equivalent to the profile page which drupal serves for authenticated users. In what way does "web site" communicate this? Do you think that the field "wants" something else?
Changing spelling of homepage makes sense but thats not what the current patch does.
Comment #12
yoroy commentedIf you look at sites/blogs with comments on, you'll see 'website' (one word) used most of the times.
But here's an issue that exposes a much bigger problem with this field: #796236: Change cryptic error message for wrong homepage URL to something easier to understand
Comment #13
fax8 commentedAs I said in #796236: Change cryptic error message for wrong homepage URL to something easier to understand, we recently run a simple Drupal based blog under some usability tests. The message of #796236 pretty confused our users.
Also the Homepage field label really confused our users. This is probably due to the fact that the tested website was in Italian so maybe Homepage isn't really a known word.
Users were also confused by the word Subject. Somehow they were confused by it.. probably the "standardized" email naming convention isn't that known or users doesn't associate a Subject of a comment on a website to the Subject of an email. The analogy simply didn't worked for our users.
Some of them were also confused by the "Save" button text. They associated it to something like Save as Draft or Save for later.
To fix this issues we ended up rewriting comment form with the following (translated from Italian to English):
Subsequent tests didn't show any problem with the above modifications.
Again, as we tested a localized Italian drupal version our findings might be misleading.. anyway I'm pretty sure that those finding could easily apply to English and other languages as well.
EDIT: the tested website was D6, so maybe the above function won't work on D7.
Comment #14
fax8 commentedWrote a blog post on our findings at http://www.varesano.net/blog/fabio/usability%20testing%20drupals%20comme...
Comment #15
damien tournoud commentedSupposing we want to do some ground work here (like for example the patch in #10), why not simply migrate this to a field and be done with it?
Comment #16
aren cambre commented@Damien Tournoud: Patch is in #7.
Comment #17
David Latapie commentedWebsite(if any)should make it easier. Few people has a website, especially if you discard Facebook profiles.Comment #18
dries commentedI'm happy to make changes to the labels of fields and buttons, and to improve error messages, but changing 'Homepage' to 'Website' doesn't seem to address the problems identified by @fax8.
Comment #19
wmostrey commentedI'm not sure that 'Your personal website' is a good alternative since some people might want to enter their company's url.
Comment #20
fax8 commentedImplemented the changes discussed on my blog post in the attached patch to current D7.
As wmostrey pointed out, 'Your personal website' is pretty restrictive so I used 'Your website'.
I also added a simple logic to display 'Save' if we are editing the comment or Submit if we are creating a new comment.
What do you think about this?
Comment #22
dries commentedI'm not a big fan of the extra help text. It sort of 'pollutes' the form.
Comment #23
fax8 commentedMe neither. Unfortunately, as the URLs have to be inserted in a specific form (http://www.example.com/) we thought that having the user reading some insertion instructions was better that have him inserting only www.example.com and then giving the wrong URL error. Any other suggestion?
Btw.. I'm not experienced with the testing results above.. What should I do to make them passes?
Comment #24
fax8 commentedIs there any interest in this? I could recreate a patch without the extra help text as Dries commented in #22 .. I just wonder if anyone cares about this issue?
Our tests showed some serious usability issues with the comment form and I really would like to do something for it before D7 goes out.
Comment #25
adam.hastings commentedWow! 398 fails for that small patch...
The test bot is searching for fields on the comment form by their title, for example...
...searches for the button with the title of "Save".
You can change the title that the test looks for, but I would suggest choosing one title, "Submit" or "Save", so that complicated revisions don't have to be made to the test file. Even if you are editing a comment, you are still submitting the form, so how about "Submit"?
Changing field names in the test file might not be the only problem, but it'd be a good place to start if you want the patch to pass.
Comment #26
retester2010 commented#20: comment-form-usability.patch queued for re-testing.
Comment #28
Anonymous (not verified) commentedNot all unregistered users will have a website. I'm not a fan of making this a required field, if that is the case in D7.
+1 on calling the field 'website'.
Comment #29
wmostrey commentedAre we going to pick up this issue for Drupal 8 or are we going to close it?
Comment #31
ksenzeeRequested a retest of #7. I think that piece is a Drupal 7-only fix, because as far as I can tell there isn't a default Homepage field for comments anymore in Drupal 8 (someone correct me if I'm wrong). The biggest usability problem here is the required http://, and there's a Drupal 8 issue for that at #1473220: Allow users to omit the http:// prefix in URL form input elements.