This may also affect 6.x, but I have not tested it on that platform yet.
Screenshots of test case attached.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| webform-email.png | 7.75 KB | yelvington | |
| webform-web.png | 10.91 KB | yelvington |
This may also affect 6.x, but I have not tested it on that platform yet.
Screenshots of test case attached.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| webform-email.png | 7.75 KB | yelvington | |
| webform-web.png | 10.91 KB | yelvington |
Comments
Comment #1
yelvington commentedUpdate: This does not appear to be broken in 6.x, but I notice that the date format differs.
date1: 2000-11-23
date2: 2000-11-23
date3: 2000-11-23
Comment #2
dayre commentedI'm having this problem with 6.x-2.9 due to a recent erroneous patch from #375874: Use Drupal's date_format function to theme dates in mails which now calls format_date but doesn't pass in the correct timezone setting for that particular form component... so it always factors in the site's timezone regardless of the form component settings. I'm going to post a patch there....
Comment #3
quicksketchLet's fix this in #375874: Use Drupal's date_format function to theme dates in mails.