Closed (fixed)
Project:
ImageCache
Version:
6.x-2.0-beta10
Component:
Miscellaneous
Priority:
Critical
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
1 Dec 2009 at 18:39 UTC
Updated:
12 Mar 2010 at 03:40 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
aschiwi commentedCould the maintainer of ImageCache please say something about this issue? I am wondering whether it makes sense to upgrade to beta10 if it's not the recommended release. But I don't like the security update message on my site either.
Comment #2
JThan commentedI need the same advice. Waiting for Info from the maintainer!
Comment #3
gregglesI think the easiest solution is to roll something that will sort properly as greater than "beta10"
So, a "final" release (i.e. without beta) or a "gamma" release if you want to follow what MySQL does.
Comment #4
suedehead commentedSame here -- Would like to know if beta10 is recommended or not. Thanks!
Comment #5
cbannerjee commentedI would NOT install beta10. I did, and every page started throwing the following errors:
* warning: call_user_func_array() [function.call-user-func-array]: First argument is expected to be a valid callback, 'theme_imagecache_formatter' was given in /homepages/38/d177998626/htdocs/drupal6/drupal/includes/theme.inc on line 617.
* warning: call_user_func_array() [function.call-user-func-array]: First argument is expected to be a valid callback, 'theme_imagecache_formatter' was given in /homepages/38/d177998626/htdocs/drupal6/drupal/includes/theme.inc on line 617.
* warning: call_user_func_array() [function.call-user-func-array]: First argument is expected to be a valid callback, 'theme_imagecache_formatter' was given in /homepages/38/d177998626/htdocs/drupal6/drupal/includes/theme.inc on line 617.
I had to revert to beta9, and all is good.
I will be happy to test it out and report back if there are suggestions on how to get rid of the error msgs or new version to load.
Comment #6
ycwjjjj commentedWould like to know it as well. Thanks!
Comment #7
Ela commentedsubscribing
Comment #8
mtsanford commentedYep.
Though I can't even seem to download beta 10. Link appears dead.
Comment #9
ozish commentedsubscribing - same issue here
(By the way, is there a better way to subscribe than posting in a thread? - Thanks)
Comment #10
jweowu commentedcbannerjee: You forgot to clear the cache, by the looks of it. That error will be due to the theme registry cache.
mtsanford: The link is certainly working at the moment:
http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/imagecache-6.x-2.0-beta10.tar.gz
There looks to have been a fair amount of work done to the module since beta9, so it's hard to say at a glance if there's any particular problem with it. My only vague concern would be that the release was prompted by the security patches, which might mean that the other changes up to that point are not as well tested as they might be. But let's face it -- these are all beta releases. I suspect that beta10 is the way to go right now.
Here is the commit for the security fixes, if anyone particularly wants to merge that with beta9:
http://drupal.org/cvs?commit=253490
Comment #11
DocMartin commentedsubscribing
Comment #12
mattiasj commentedsubscribing
Comment #13
chriscohen commentedI would also like some clarification on the recommended release. I can confirm that we have been using beta10 on production sites for quite some time with no issues.
Comment #14
Anonymous (not verified) commentedI just installed beta 9 and got the security warning in the admin to upgrade to beta 10.
After upgrading to 10, I get the following error when trying to create a new preset:
warning: call_user_func_array() [function.call-user-func-array]: First argument is expected to be a valid callback, 'imagecache_ui_preset_add_form' was given in [mywebpath]/includes/form.inc on line 372.
I cleared the cache, and had the site down while making the update.
Should I roll back to beta 9, or is there a quick fix to my problem?
Thanks.
Comment #15
mtsanford commentedJust tried that myself and had no problem making a new preset (just one resize operation). You should probably file a bug report or support request, as that is not the topic of this thread.
Comment #16
junipllc commentedsubscribing
Comment #17
roball commentedAny plans for releasing the final 6.x-2.0?
Comment #18
phayes commentedbeta10 is now recommended