Operations bunched up in url redirect list screen [#650216]

Operations such as Edit and Delete appear bunched up - See attached screenshots which show a comparison of the URL aliases and path redirect list screens. I think you should give each operation it's own table cell like URL aliases - this provides a clearer interface and more opportunities for tweaking with css.

Comment	File	Size	Author
	url-aliases.png	4.55 KB	mrfelton
	path_redirect.png	8.29 KB	mrfelton

Comments

Comment #1

dave reid

he/him

English

Nebraska USA

commented 3 December 2009 at 14:21

This is actually the new standard set by core and the best way I could get a tableselect element integrated.

Comment #2

mrfelton commented 3 December 2009 at 15:51

not very usable like that though... maybe it's my theme that is causing them to be so bunched?!

Comment #3

dave reid

he/him

English

Nebraska USA

commented 3 December 2009 at 17:53

Those elements are td > ul.links.inline > li. Here's the CSS from Garland that gets used for this element:

ul.links li, ul.inline li {
background-image:none;
margin-left:0;
margin-right:0;
padding-left:0;
padding-right:1em;
}

ul.inline li {
-moz-background-clip:border;
-moz-background-inline-policy:continuous;
-moz-background-origin:padding;
background:transparent none repeat scroll 0 0;
margin:0;
padding:0 1em 0 0;
}

I think the important thing is padding-right: 1em; Maybe you need to add something like this to your theme? Are you using a custom theme or one from drupal.org?

Comment #4

dave reid

he/him

English

Nebraska USA

commented 3 December 2009 at 18:05

I just tested it with Zen and it works by default. However, in my testing I noticed that the operations would wrap if I moved collapsed my window, which was not a desired behavior. Not sure if I should force it to not wrap or not via a new path_redirect.css file.

Comment #5

mrfelton commented 3 December 2009 at 18:29

I'm using the Rubik theme, that is recommended for use with the admin module (dev seed). Maybe I should file a bug with them (haven't looked at their css yet though)