IE 6 shows elements with position:fixed as position:static. Currently we made it look right again by removing the padding-top from body.
But toolbar needs it's z-index to stay above overlay. position:static does not use z-index. Therefor we should use position:absolute for #toolbar in IE6 instead of removing the padding-top from body.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #3 | after_overlay.png | 32.83 KB | casey |
| #3 | before_overlay.png | 32.56 KB | casey |
| #3 | after.png | 24.63 KB | casey |
| #3 | before.png | 24.52 KB | casey |
| overlaytoolbarIE6.patch | 794 bytes | casey |
Comments
Comment #1
kiphaas7 commentedSince this is a patch against toolbar, shouldn't it belong there?
Comment #3
casey commentedCritical for IE6 users :p
Comment #4
aspilicious commentedLooks much better, IE6 is such a crappy browser, everything looks crappy anyway...
im confused with the code
is this the IE6 only hack you were talking about (the * html)
Comment #5
casey commentedhttp://www.webdevout.net/css-hacks#in_css-selectors
Yes, It's one of the few CSS valid hacks. And newer browsers aren't going to support this as the html element doesn't have a parent. Perfect hack.
As you see this hack is used now too.
I can have a look at other things looking crappy in IE6 later. This one is RTBC?
Comment #6
aspilicious commentedCan i ask what you use to test IE6?
I used IEtester in the past but that one doesnt work on my windows 7 64 bit operating system.
And as this i an IE6 only affecting style thing, and it works in IE6 then i guess it is RTBC.
Comment #7
casey commentedhttp://finalbuilds.edskes.net/iecollection.htm on winXP
Comment #8
aspilicious commenteddoesn't work either
windows 7 hates IE6 i guess :D
Comment #9
CalebD commentedMicrosoft has a Virtual Hard Disk available of Windows XP SP3 with IE6 installed. You can use Virtual PC 2007 with the VHD to test IE6.
VHDs: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=21eabb90-958f-4...
Virtual PC: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=04D26402-3199-4...
If you're on a non Windows OS, you might be able to convert the VHDs to another format, but I'm not sure if that is acceptable under the terms of using the VHD files.
Comment #10
aspilicious commentedOk but thats only a minor issue here, review this thing so it will be rtbc ;)
Comment #11
dries commentedCommited to CVS HEAD. It isn't 100% clear whether this is RTBC, but it sounds like it is. Unfortunately, I don't have IE6 so I can't really verify it.