here is a first patch to test [comment-parent-auto-numbering]
to get the result mentioned at #647404: support more [comment-parent-*] tokens the settings would be:
Non repetitive prefix: #[comment-auto-numbering] Re: #[comment-parent-auto-numbering]
Default subject: leave it empty
Non repetitive suffix: leave it empty
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 2010-01-06_comment-parent-auto-numbering(unix).patch | 3.33 KB | arhak |
| 2010-01-05_comment-parent-auto-numbering(trial).patch | 3.68 KB | arhak |
Comments
Comment #1
arhak commentedsorry, wrong patch (git)
now it should work
Comment #2
arhak commentedBTW: since Default subject: doesn't contains
[comment-parent-title]there is no need to put the pattern as a prefix, meaning, it will also work like:Non repetitive prefix: leave it empty
Default subject: #
[comment-auto-numbering]Re: #[comment-parent-auto-numbering]Non repetitive suffix: leave it empty
since the actual magic of "non repetitive prefix/suffix" is about stripping undesired repetitions when using
[comment-parent-title]nevertheless, either way would work
Comment #3
skizzo commentedcan't review the code, but I have been running the patch i#1 succefully (against 6.x-2.0-alpha2 ) for few days
Comment #4
arhak commentedcommitted to 6.x-2.x-dev, will be included in next alpha3 release #682622: [meta-issue] preparing 6.x-2.0-alpha3
Comment #5
arhak commented