The download method in DrushMakeDownload_Hg just delete .hg directory right after cloning. Sometimes I want the actual repo intact, the case when doing development of install profile for example. It's only when packaging the final product we want it to produce a 'clean build'. I looked into the download method for CVS and it use working-copy option so why not allow this for hg as well ?

For example, I can do something like:-

$ drush make --working-copy test.make www

I'm not sure whether that was the intention of working-copy option in cvs download method but I think there must be some option to tell drush make to create exact clone of the repo.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#12 drush_make_hg_test_1.patch1.03 KBparsingphase
#11 drush_make_add_hg.patch4.82 KBparsingphase
#5 drush_make-working-copy.patch2.56 KBk4ml
#3 drush_make-working-copy.patch2.58 KBk4ml
#1 hg-working_copy.patch746 bytesk4ml

Comments

k4ml’s picture

k4ml commented
StatusFileSize
new hg-working_copy.patch746 bytes

forgot to attach the patch.

Frando’s picture

Frando commented
Status: Active » Needs work

Nice. Was looking for something similar recently. The --working-copy option should be applied to git as well, though

k4ml’s picture

k4ml commented
StatusFileSize
new drush_make-working-copy.patch2.58 KB

Included git and bzr. bzr not tested though.

dmitrig01’s picture

dmitrig01 commented

Please use ! instead of null.

k4ml’s picture

k4ml commented
StatusFileSize
new drush_make-working-copy.patch2.56 KB

Revised patch.

dmitrig01’s picture

dmitrig01 commented
Status: Needs work » Fixed

Comitted, thanks

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

blazindrop’s picture

blazindrop commented
Category: feature » support
Status: Closed (fixed) » Active

I noticed that starting with the the beta7 release, hg integration was removed, but there was no associated issue or discussion (at least that I can find). Will this be readded in the future? I'm reopening this issue so someone coming across this issue will see that it was removed.

beta7 release notes are here: http://drupal.org/node/840554

dmitrig01’s picture

dmitrig01 commented

Unless someone is willing to step up to write the integration and bring to be feature-compatible as the other VCS systems, and also write tests for it, it will not be added back.

dmitrig01’s picture

dmitrig01 commented
Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)

I'm going to close this, but if anyone wants to add hg back they can feel free to open a new issue.

parsingphase’s picture

parsingphase commented
Version: 6.x-2.0-beta5 » 6.x-2.3
StatusFileSize
new drush_make_add_hg.patch4.82 KB

This is a patch to add mercurial support back to drush make 2.3.
With the exception of branches, it's a feature match against the git support.

I will add tests shortly and hopefully support this officially.

Please drop me a line if there is a more appropriate issue re: mercurial support to file this against. Otherwise I'll open a new one.

parsingphase’s picture

parsingphase commented
StatusFileSize
new drush_make_hg_test_1.patch1.03 KB

First patch of tests. Obviously a lot more to do; anyone who knows any stable mercurial repositories for drupal modules etc is welcome to tell me about them so I can use them for testing, particularly if they contain internal branches (none of ours do).

parsingphase’s picture

parsingphase commented

See http://drupal.org/node/1259770 for a ticket on replacing mercurial support.