By shiva7663 on
I'd like to set up my (WinXP) dev machine to be able to work on several completely independent Drupal 6 projects at once.
- I'd like to only have one copy of my basic technology stack (in this case, XAMPP v2.7.1). No external access allowed.
- Under the htdocs folder, a separate Drupal folder for each project.
- In mysql, a separate database for each project (named to make it obvious which Drupal project it is for).
Are there any implications to this plan that I may be missing? The way I did it before was to install the technology stack many times, but that was becoming unwieldy. Likewise, a classic multisite install of Drupal 6 seems needlessly complex for what I'm trying to do.
Comments
I have been using wamp
I know your post talks about xamp.. I just thought I would say how easy the wamp set up is.
I think I have 10 drupal test sites and 4 other sites I work on in wamp.
To set up a new site is easy, just add another folder in the C:\wamp\www directory and add a database in the phpmyadmin.
The whole deal only takes about 2 minutes to add a separate site. The wamp task bar icon makes navigation easy.
Often times I have many of the sites open at the same time..
If you use wamp, I recommend grabbing a copy from source forge with php 5.2*
I think 1.7.4 will work..
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wampserver/files/WAMP5/
XAMPP 2.7.1 is the most
XAMPP 2.7.1 is the most recent distribution that still uses PHP 5.2.x. I thought about getting the current XAMPP and downgrading the PHP to a version appropriate to Drupal 6, but have not found advice on the Apache Friends support forum that deals with that case. Quite a while ago, they had a PHP version switcher feature that swapped between PHP4 and PHP5, but they don't use that any more, so I'm not certain I could adapt that old functionality to swap between PHP 5.2 and PHP 5.3.
I have xamp too
the problem is for me at least, it's too much messing around compared to the wamp set up.
I guess I am busy working on sites and don't need to play with getting things to work..
I have nothing against xamp and do use it for fun once in a while..
I'd rather not have this
I'd rather not have this discussion devolve into a technology stack war. I'm more interested in the other implications of my original post than the trivia of what stack I'm running.
not an issue
as I had said, use what you like. I am not a server admin. Xamp is just fine, you can add as many sites as you want with it too. I know many of the developers use xamp.
Ok, the procedure is pretty
Ok, the procedure is pretty easy; I'll see if it's OK in my current project, in case some gotcha rears its ugly head.