Closed (fixed)
Project:
Comment driven
Version:
6.x-1.0-unstable4
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
9 Mar 2010 at 17:00 UTC
Updated:
24 Mar 2010 at 09:20 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
Takafumi commentedtypo ;p
Comment #2
arhak commentedI won't ask you for screenshots in english, but please, some text would be handy
as far as I can tell, you have:
1- text
2- userreference
3- a dropdown list
and when you attempt to use 2 & 3 under a fieldgroup they don't work, is that right?
in that case, I should ask you two more details (screenshots or text)
- how do your CCK fields lay out?
- what do you see as available properties in comment driven fieldset in that content type settings?
e.g.
cck layout:
- prop1
- group1
+- prop2
+- prop3
available driven properties:
- CCK » prop1
- CCK » group1 » prop2
- CCK » group1 » prop3
are you sure your properties are checked AFTER you moved them from outside the group into the group?
the exposed property is sensible to that change as it is reflected in the form structure
PS: if it was your case lets change this issue to a missing documentation one
Comment #3
arhak commentedmmm... renaming a vocabulary doesn't uncheck its driven property, since it is tied to its tid
moving fields into/out from groups change their path into the form structure, but the field id (its machine name) is preserved
after all, fieldgroup support might be improved regarding this
I'll wait until this be confirmed as a bug, otherwise change it to "feature request" or a documentation task
Comment #4
arhak commentedgot wrong varname in a refactor
Comment #5
arhak commentedfirst introduced in unstable2 (wow, how much I need some tests!)
Comment #6
arhak commentedwhat am I doing? (I'm asleep)
this belongs to HEAD
Comment #7
arhak commentedcommitted to HEAD
Comment #8
arhak commentedshould no longer apply for unstable5
Comment #9
Takafumi commentedI'm sorry for my poor description. But you are super, fieldgroup is now working!
Thank you so much, arhak!
Comment #10
arhak commentedactually it was me being asleep
I saw your screenshot and tried to read japanese when I didn't need to know what was in it
next time for fieldgroup issues, the accurate description would be textual rather than screenshot, as the example at #2:
- the level of depth where the property lives
- and most of all: the available driven properties with their depth level
enjoy it, and thanks for your useful feedback