Blogger allows to use a tag that looks like this:

false

This tag is causing a problem on aggregator. If you import the atom feed of blogger, then, it will have "false" always written on the end of the post. Check here to check a real example: http://www.redeliberal.com/aggregator.

I also attached an example of a problematic feed.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
atom.xml.txt39.39 KBmcduarte2000

Comments

mcduarte2000’s picture

The tag looks like this:

<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>

magico’s picture

Version: 4.7.3 » x.y.z

Confirmed in HEAD.

But the false only appears if the entry tag has the draft tag after a summary tag. Else it works fine.

Example (that shows the false):

<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
  <link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/6533266/116143382473553536" rel="service.edit" title="Leitura recomendada" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <summary mode="escaped" type="text/plain" xml:base="http://ablasfemia.blogspot.com">bla bla bla</summary>
  <draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>

Example (that works like we want):

<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
  <link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/6533266/116139263559710507" rel="service.edit" title="que desilusão!" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://ablasfemia.blogspot.com" xml:space="preserve">
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <a href="http://sic.sapo.pt/online/noticias/mundo/20061020iraoameacaeuropa.htm">Afinal não era só para enfardar porrada no Bush?</a>
    </div>
  </content>
  <draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
L4san’s picture

Version: x.y.z » 7.x-dev

What's this issue status? Solved in current version?

Moving it to cvs.

lilou’s picture

Status: Active » Postponed (maintainer needs more info)
sun.core’s picture

Status: Postponed (maintainer needs more info) » Closed (won't fix)

Sorry, without further information this issue can only be marked as won't fix.

Feel free to re-open this issue if you want to provide further information. Thanks.