Comments

Juliancpackt’s picture

StatusFileSize
new49.04 KB
new27.24 KB
new40.88 KB
gdemet’s picture

Assigned: Juliancpackt » gdemet
Status: Active » Needs review

Hi Julian - The front page schedule is a little dominated by DrupalCon this week, but we'll be sure to review this after that's over.

gdemet’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

I've gone through and made some formatting changes and added optimized versions of the images to the post.

I see a couple of references in the comments to some performance issues and a request for more information on the shopping cart configuration. I'd also like to see more language about how and why Drupal was chosen for the project.

If you'd like to edit the post to make those changes, just post an update here, and we'll change the input filter on the post so you can make further edits to it.

gdemet’s picture

Assigned: gdemet » Unassigned

Hi Julian -

Are you planning to make further edits to the post so that it can be considered for front page promotion, or should I close out this issue?

gdemet’s picture

Status: Needs work » Closed (won't fix)
Juliancpackt’s picture

Status: Closed (won't fix) » Needs work

Hi George,

We are going to wait for the issues mentioned to be worked on by our development team and then I will work with you to see if we can promote this for front page promotion

gdemet’s picture

Thanks Julian -

I've changed the input format back to "Filtered HTML" so that you can edit the text of the case study if needed; in particular, as I mentioned above, some more language about how and why Drupal was chosen for the project (given that Packt publishes books on a wide variety of open source content management platforms) would be great.

Juliancpackt’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

Hi George,

I have worked with my team who owned the website revamp project and as a result I have added a section in the article called 'So how was Drupal chosen for the project?'. This explains why and how we came about the decision. The Packt website has been worked on over the past few months by our development team and we have worked through the teething problems mentioned in the comments above. We now receive little to no complaints regarding the new website.

Let me know if this is okay and whether it's viable to get this promoted to the front page. Thanks

Julian

gdemet’s picture

I've reviewed and tweaked the changes and turned on Full HTML format. I think this case study looks great, and it gets a +1 from me, but I would feel better about it if someone from Packt or the development team could respond to the concerns raised about performance in the comments, specifically http://drupal.org/node/776740#comment-2885266

Once we get a +1 from another site maintainer, I'll be more than happy to add this to the front page promotion schedule.

fgm’s picture

@gdemet I can followup on my earlier comment, which you reference. Packt and/or their supplier seems to have done a good job fixing (most of) the performance issues with the site. Unability to connect no longer seems to appear, and authenticated response times, while still rather slow (more than 5 seconds to fetch a page once authenticated) are no longer critical like they were at the time I did this comment, and are now actually usable.

Note that although it is no longer critically slow, Alexa stills classified them as very slow, 89% of all sites being faster.

gdemet’s picture

@fgm: That's great to hear! If you or someone at Packt could post a reply in that thread letting folks know that the situation has gotten a lot better since that comment was made, I think it would clarify things tremendously. Right now, there's no indication the issues have been fixed, which could reflect poorly on Drupal's reputation running high-performance sites.

fgm’s picture

@gdemet: comment added in the other issue.

Juliancpackt’s picture

Hi guys,

Thanks for your comments, I will add a response on behalf of Packt to the article shortly.

In response to the traffic stats on Alexa, we have found while Alexa is useful for some stats (location of visitors etc.), it does not take into consideration the website's richness. It does rank websites with text only against websites with vast amounts of multimedia content and naturally the website with merely text will have a greater loading time. That said, we at Packt are continiously working on the speed in which our website works and hope that the redesign will be working as fast as the previous website (which had a really quick loading time) soon.

I will complete the response in the article and we can go forward.

P.S are you guys attending Drupalcon Copenhagen Aug 2010?

fgm’s picture

@julianpackt: yes, we should be. Hopefully presenting the redesign of Le Figaro.

gdemet’s picture

The response looks good to me, and now we just need a +1 from another site maintainer/webmaster to get it on the front page schedule.

Juliancpackt’s picture

Thanks!

I hope to see you guys at the Drupalcon!

bonobo’s picture

+1

Promote this.

gdemet’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » gdemet
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

Thanks Bill! It looks like there's a DrupalCon Copenhagen story that's been added to the home page schedule for today, but I haven't seen any mention of it in this queue. I'll follow up with some Copenhagen folks to see if we need to promote that story today, which would push this case study to Thursday or Friday; otherwise I'll promote it today.

wulff’s picture

The Copenhagen story will be ready to go in an hour or so.

I'll create an issue and link to it from the front page schedule.

gdemet’s picture

Putting this on the schedule for Friday, 6/18.

Juliancpackt’s picture

Thanks that's great! :)

gdemet’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

Promoted.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.