similar topic: http://drupal.org/node/494462#new
no reason to block it. it should visitable on search engine and let users can find us.
I mean, the contact module is core, but on most sites something like a contact section (contact press department, contact webmasters) with important address information will not be indexed if u would have aliases like /contact/press or /contact/webmaster.
Is it really up to Drupal core to enforce /contact/ as a disallowed path just because core contains a module that uses /contact ?
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #16 | 905576-14-remove-contact-from-robots-D6.patch | 497 bytes | idflood |
| #15 | 905576-15-remove-contact-from-robots-D6.patch | 683 bytes | tim.plunkett |
| #12 | contact.patch | 497 bytes | droplet |
| #9 | 905576-9-remove-contact-from-robots.patch | 497 bytes | idflood |
| #6 | 905576-6-remove-contact-from-robots.patch | 683 bytes | tim.plunkett |
Comments
Comment #1
teezee commentedSubscribe, thanks @droplet for posting :)
Comment #2
abaddon commentednot to mention the people who use google as the address bar or if the contact link isnt that visible and they search for "site:example.com contact"..
Comment #3
idflood commentedHere is a quick patch. Contact page must be crawled by search engine, it's definitly one of the most important page to be referenced for most of the sites I do.
Comment #4
droplet commentedComment #5
webchickWeird. I've no idea why that would be blocked.
Committed to HEAD. Marking down to 6.x.
Comment #6
tim.plunkettEasy peasy.
Comment #7
droplet commentedjust started up my box to patch it and you did.. haha
patch works
Comment #9
idflood commentedMaybe this one will pass.
Comment #10
idflood commentedComment #12
droplet commentedtry this
Comment #14
droplet commentedok. "testbot work ONLY with D7 patches"
http://drupal.org/node/894166
Comment #15
tim.plunkettOh, duh. Back to RTBC per #7.
Comment #16
idflood commentedOk, I forgot that the tests only work for d7 ( http://drupal.org/node/894166#comment-3693940 ). So here is the same patch as #9, only filename is changed to prevent the patch from beeing incorrectly tested.
Comment #17
tim.plunkettcross-post
Comment #18
izmeez commentedsubscribing
Comment #19
gábor hojtsyThanks, committed and pushed.