Running Drupal core 6.19, Meta tags Node Type 6.x-1.7, Nodewords 6.x-1.11, Token 6.x-1.14
Started getting 404 responses from ICRA, so we contacted FOSI, the parent organization. They told us they were no longer supporting ICRA.
Do you anticipate releasing code updates in response? If so, would it be possible to replace the ICRA field with a ""?
Thanks!
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #14 | nodewords-n927186-14.patch | 7.86 KB | damienmckenna |
| #13 | nodewords-n927186-13.patch | 7.31 KB | damienmckenna |
| #5 | nodewords-n927186-5.patch | 7.73 KB | damienmckenna |
| #4 | 927186-nodewords-remove-pics-support.patch | 6.96 KB | dave reid |
| #3 | 927186-nodewords-remove-pics-support.patch | 6.91 KB | dave reid |
Comments
Comment #1
mustang commentedRunning Drupal core 6.19, Meta tags Node Type 6.x-1.7, Nodewords 6.x-1.11, Token 6.x-1.14
Started getting 404 responses from ICRA, so we contacted FOSI, the parent organization. They told us they were no longer supporting ICRA.
Do you anticipate releasing code updates in response? If so, would it be possible to replace the ICRA field with a generic meta tag field that allows users to supply values (e.g., "http-equiv")?
Thanks!
Comment #2
dave reidConfirmed from http://www.rsac.org/. We should probably just remove ICRA support completely.
Comment #3
dave reidWe shouldn't ship the next stable with a meaningless and unsupported meta tag.
Comment #4
dave reidRevised with a variable_del() in nodewords_extra_update_6106().
Comment #5
damienmckennaYou missed the redundant variable_del('nodewords_icra_validation_content'); from nodewords_uninstall() and the 'pics-label' value in nodewords_extra_uninstall().
Comment #6
dave reidI think it's still fine to use #4 over #5 in the case that the user doesn't run update.php before uninstalling the nodewords_extras module.
Comment #7
damienmckennaFair point.
Comment #8
damienmckenna@mustang: Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Committed!
Comment #10
Anonymous (not verified) commentedICRA is now POWDER
It's come to my attention that the "new ICRA" is now POWDER: http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-primer/
Is this going to be supported?
Cheers
Comment #11
damienmckennaThis needs to be re-rolled against the new v6.x-1.x branch.
Comment #12
damienmckenna@naoise: I added a new issue for the POWDER support: #1200204: POWDER integration (replaces ICRA Labelling)
Comment #13
damienmckennaHere's a patch re-rolled against the current 6.x-1.x branch.
Comment #14
damienmckennaRe-rolled.
Comment #15
damienmckennaCommitted (again).