If you are still on cck_address and don't mind getting your hands dirty with a bit of SQL .. a set of queries that will migrate your data from cck_address 5.x tables to location_cck 6.x tables in the same database. This is for use after upgrading a site from 5.x to 6.x, with the destination Location CCK field already created and the legacy cck_address table still existing in the same database.
In my example, I am using:
Source table: content_field_address (5.x cck_address field with machine name "field_address")
Destination table: content_field_location (6.x location_cck field with machine name "field_location")
Both fields were set to limit to 1 maximum value.
** Back up your database first! You WILL lose data and this probably will NOT work the first time! **
The query will need to be modified if your field machine names are not the same as above. The content_field_location table is rebuilt completely.
SET @ num := ifnull(
(
SELECT
max(lid)+ 1
FROM
location_instance
),
0
);
INSERT INTO location_instance(nid, vid, uid, genid, lid) SELECT
nid,
vid,
0 AS uid,
concat(
'cck:field_location:',
cast(vid AS char)
)AS genid,
(@ num := @ num + 1)AS lid
FROM
content_field_address
ORDER BY
vid ASC;
INSERT INTO location(
lid,
NAME,
street,
additional,
city,
province,
postal_code,
country,
latitude,
longitude,
SOURCE,
is_primary
)SELECT
b.lid,
'' AS NAME,
trim(a.field_address_street1),
trim(
concat(
a.field_address_street2,
' ',
a.field_address_apt,
' ',
field_address_other
)
)AS additional,
a.field_address_city,
a.field_address_state,
a.field_address_zip,
lcase(trim(a.field_address_country)),
0,
0,
3 AS SOURCE,
0 AS is_primary
FROM
content_field_address a,
location_instance b
WHERE
a.vid = b.vid
AND a.nid = b.nid
AND genid LIKE 'cck:field_location:%'
ORDER BY
lid ASC;
DELETE
FROM
content_field_location
WHERE
field_location_lid > 0;
INSERT INTO content_field_location(vid, nid, field_location_lid) SELECT
vid,
nid,
lid
FROM
location_instance
WHERE
genid LIKE 'cck:field_location:%'
ORDER BY
nid ASC;
Hope someone finds this useful..
Regards,
Jason Fisher
Comments
Comment #1
jason.fisher commentedShould have posted the query as a comment.. will make improvements here:
* changed source from 3 to 4 to enable JIT geocoding(?)