heh heh - but it's true!

IE3, in the good old days BEFORE CSS (-;

CommentFileSizeAuthor
do-redesign-IE3.jpg97.19 KBdecibel.places

Comments

seutje’s picture

seutje commented

looks pretty compatible to me, markup is in a logical order and wrapped in proper elements...

were you expecting it to magically cause browsers that don't have css support to get css support?
or were you expecting a dreadful table layout with spacer gifs and other horrid layout-related img tags?

I suppose the actual content bit could be pushed to an earlier location in the markup, but to say it's "incompatible" is way over the top, and bringing IE3 to the table is just silly, would have been better if you had used lynx as an example of a non-css browser, although that doesn't rly render headings big & bold and stuff like that...

decibel.places’s picture

decibel.places commented

bringing IE3 to the table is just silly

I think you got the drift ;-)

and your comments on logical markup presentation are spot on!

coderintherye’s picture

coderintherye commented

That screenshot brings back horrible memories.