Jeff (Noyz) has moved his site to Drupal Gardens and would like the Drupal Planet feed updated.
His old feed page was:
http://www.jeffnoyes.com/taxonomy/term/60/0
His new Gardens site is available at:
http://jeffnoyes.drupalgardens.com
With the new taxonomy page is "Acquia", available at:
http://jeffnoyes.drupalgardens.com/taxonomy/term/72
.... With the following feed page:
http://jeffnoyes.drupalgardens.com/taxonomy/term/72/feed
Thanks a lot,
Rob
Comments
Comment #1
Noyz commentedActually, correct path is: http://jeffnoyes.drupalgardens.com/taxonomy/term/77
Comment #2
Noyz commentedand http://www.jeffnoyes.com/taxonomy/term/77
Comment #3
gregglesIn #2 it sounds like you're saying that the correct url should actually be the jeffnoyes.com domain, which makes sense.
Can you migrate in some of the content from your old site?
Comment #4
Noyz commentedWhat's the purpose? Will something break if I dont?
Comment #5
Bojhan commented@greggles I am not following either what the problem is, his blog has many Drupal posts - just none in the Drupal feed yet. Which seems understandable, since he was already accepted this is just a technical change, the decision of accepting was already made.
Comment #6
gregglesIf the blog has many Drupal posts then it should be easy to comply with the rule that feeds have 3 example items in them already.
My experience from watching this queue and my personal belief is that when there is a technical change like this we should ensure that the feeds meet all the conditions for inclusion. The reason that's important is that the conditions change over time and we don't have another system for going back and fixing them up.
Of course I'm not the gate-keeper on this issue nor in this component in general.
Comment #7
Noyz commentedI can migrate the content, and plan to for certain posts. I just don't have the bandwidth to do so now. Can you make this port and I'll promise to migrate when I get a chance?
Comment #8
Bojhan commented@greggles Wouldn't tagging a few posts that are Drupal planet worthy (I already saw two) do?
Comment #9
Bojhan commentedThe taxonomy term probably needs an update, I see many other updates that would qualify for core.
Comment #10
tvn commentedClosing old issues. Please re-open if needed.